rs435080

Variant names:

• chr1-158685246-G-A
• rs435080
• NM_003126.4:c.126C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BA1

The NM_003126.4(SPTA1):​c.126C>T​(p.Val42Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.995 in 1,613,794 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 799,329 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.97 (72254 hom., cov: 31)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 1.0 (727075 hom.)
• Consequence: SPTA1 NM_003126.4 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.307

Genes affected

SPTA1 (HGNC:11272): (spectrin alpha, erythrocytic 1) This gene encodes a member of a family of molecular scaffold proteins that link the plasma membrane to the actin cytoskeleton and functions in the determination of cell shape, arrangement of transmembrane proteins, and organization of organelles. The encoded protein is primarily composed of 22 spectrin repeats which are involved in dimer formation. It forms a component of the erythrocyte plasma membrane. Mutations in this gene result in a variety of hereditary red blood cell disorders, including elliptocytosis-2, pyropoikilocytosis, and spherocytosis, type 3. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
• BP6: Variant 1-158685246-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-158685246-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 258916.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-158685246-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.307 with no splicing effect.
• BA1: GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.994 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SPTA1	NM_003126.4	c.126C>T	p.Val42Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 52	ENST00000643759.2	NP_003117.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SPTA1	ENST00000643759.2	c.126C>T	p.Val42Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 52		NM_003126.4	ENSP00000495214.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.974 AC: 148054 AN: 152020 Hom.: 72200 Cov.: 31

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.910

Gnomad AMI AF: 1.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.989

Gnomad ASJ AF: 1.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 1.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.999

Gnomad FIN AF: 1.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.997

Gnomad NFE AF: 1.00

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.977

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.993 AC: 245244 AN: 246954 Hom.: 121824 AF XY: 0.995 AC XY: 133497 AN XY: 134202

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.906

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.995

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.997

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.997 AC: 1457747 AN: 1461656 Hom.: 727075 Cov.: 71 AF XY: 0.998 AC XY: 725429 AN XY: 727134

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.910

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.994

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.994

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.974 AC: 148165 AN: 152138 Hom.: 72254 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.975 AC XY: 72545 AN XY: 74390

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.910

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.989

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.999

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.977

Alfa AF: 0.988 Hom.: 32188

Bravo AF: 0.970

Asia WGS AF: 0.995 AC: 3459 AN: 3476

EpiCase AF: 1.00

EpiControl AF: 1.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4

Nov 29, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 27, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Elliptocytosis 2 Benign:2

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Hereditary spherocytosis type 3 Benign:2

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Pyropoikilocytosis, hereditary Benign:2

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.52
CADD	Benign	3.8
DANN	Benign	0.92

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.030		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs435080; hg19: chr1-158655036;