rs4429853

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):​c.5115-5T>C variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.363 in 1,611,676 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 108,496 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.40 ( 12597 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.36 ( 95899 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00003832
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.128
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
Variant 5-13844998-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13844998-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 163149.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-13844998-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.589 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DNAH5NM_001369.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.5115-5T>C splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant ENST00000265104.5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DNAH5ENST00000265104.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.5115-5T>C splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_001369.3 P4
DNAH5ENST00000681290.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.5070-5T>C splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant A1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.401
AC:
60853
AN:
151824
Hom.:
12578
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.498
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.416
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.371
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.347
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.607
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.347
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.315
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.282
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.353
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.398
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.379
AC:
94931
AN:
250624
Hom.:
18785
AF XY:
0.372
AC XY:
50483
AN XY:
135546
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.502
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.363
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.341
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.630
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.340
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.320
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.351
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.369
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.359
AC:
524248
AN:
1459734
Hom.:
95899
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.358
AC XY:
259714
AN XY:
726308
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.497
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.369
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.339
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.559
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.339
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.326
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.351
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.370
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.401
AC:
60913
AN:
151942
Hom.:
12597
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.398
AC XY:
29538
AN XY:
74272
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.499
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.371
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.347
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.607
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.346
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.315
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.353
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.396
Alfa
AF:
0.364
Hom.:
5062
Bravo
AF:
0.413
Asia WGS
AF:
0.454
AC:
1576
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.349
EpiControl
AF:
0.345

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 21, 20135115-5T>C in intron 31 of DNAH5: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 49.9% (2200/4406) of African Ameri can chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (h ttp://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs4429853). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 10, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPars Genome LabJun 15, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 10, 2018- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.92
CADD
Benign
1.4
DANN
Benign
0.30

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000038
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.050
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4429853; hg19: chr5-13845107; COSMIC: COSV104595587; API