Menu
GeneBe

rs45437094

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):c.3103C>T(p.Arg1035Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000308 in 1,614,128 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1035H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00020 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00032 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

BRIP1
NM_032043.3 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.04
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRIP1 (HGNC:20473): (BRCA1 interacting helicase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RecQ DEAH helicase family and interacts with the BRCT repeats of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). The bound complex is important in the normal double-strand break repair function of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). This gene may be a target of germline cancer-inducing mutations. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005931914).
BP6
Variant 17-61683943-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-61683943-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 140819.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=8, Likely_benign=6}. Variant chr17-61683943-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000319 (467/1461864) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00416 (359/86250). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00381. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 322 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRIP1NM_032043.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.3103C>T p.Arg1035Cys missense_variant 20/20 ENST00000259008.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRIP1ENST00000259008.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.3103C>T p.Arg1035Cys missense_variant 20/201 NM_032043.3 P2Q9BX63-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000197
AC:
30
AN:
152146
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00435
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000589
AC:
148
AN:
251444
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000773
AC XY:
105
AN XY:
135888
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00438
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000967
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000319
AC:
467
AN:
1461864
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000443
AC XY:
322
AN XY:
727234
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00416
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000656
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000197
AC:
30
AN:
152264
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000242
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00436
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000146
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000604
ExAC
AF:
0.000585
AC:
71
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 27, 2016Variant summary: The BRIP1 c.3103C>T (p.Arg1035Cys) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 4/5 in silico tools predict a benign outcome. This variant was found in 72/125562 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the South Asian subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0039976 (66/16510). This frequency is about 64 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRIP1 variant (0.0000625), highly suggesting this is a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of South Asian origin. Additionally, the variant of interest was found to co-occur with a likely pathogenic PALB2 variant, c.829_832delGACC, in one internal LCA specimen. Furthermore, one clinical diagnostic laboratory recently classified this variant as likely benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 29, 2021In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26315354, 26921362, 25722345, 21279724, 17033622) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024BRIP1: BP4, BS2 -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 06, 2017The p.Arg1035Cys variant (rs45437094) has been reported in the medical literature in at least one case of non-serous ovarian cancer (Ramus 2015). The p.Arg1035Cys variant is listed in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) browser with an allele frequency of 0.48% in the South Asian population (identified in 135 out of 30,782 chromosomes; 0 homozygotes), and is listed in ClinVar (likely benign/uncertain significance; Variant ID: 140819). The arginine at codon 1,035 is weakly conserved considering 12 species (Alamut software v2.9.0), and computational analyses suggest that this variant does not affect the Brip1 protein structure/function (SIFT: tolerated, PolyPhen2: benign, MutationTaster: polymorphism). While the p.Arg1035Cys appears to be a benign polymorphism in the South Asian population, the available information is insufficient to determine the clinical significance with certainty. -
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoDec 03, 2020DNA sequence analysis of the BRIP1 gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.3103C>T, in exon 20 that results in an amino acid change, p.Arg1035Cys. This sequence change does not appear to have been previously described in patients with BRIP1-related disorders and has been described in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.44% in the South Asian sub-population (dbSNP rs45437094). The p.Arg1035Cys change affects a poorly conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the BRIP1 protein that is not known to be functional. In-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL) provide contradictory results for the p.Arg1035Cys substitution. Due to these contrasting evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Arg1035Cys change remains unknown at this time. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalFeb 06, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoOct 16, 2020- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Sep 16, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJul 17, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 29, 2022This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Fanconi anemia complementation group J Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylOct 21, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 15, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 01, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNeuberg Centre For Genomic Medicine, NCGM-The missense variant p.R1035C in BRIP1 (NM_032043.3) has been reported previously in 2/189 Turkmen patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (Akbari MR et al, 2011) and in a Caucasian patient diagnosed with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (Shindo K et al, 2017). Variants in gene BRIP1 have been observed in individuals affected with Ovarian Cancer (Moyer et al, 2020 ). There is a large physicochemical difference between arginine and cysteine, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. In silico tools predict the variant to be tolerated. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Uncertain Significance. -
Neoplasm of ovary Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylOct 21, 2016- -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRIP1 p.Arg1035Cys variant was identified in 1 of 26426 proband chromosomes (frequency: 3.78 E-05) from individuals or families with breast cancer and was not identified in 10484 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Easton 2016). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs45437094) as With Uncertain significance allele, ClinVar with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity (as likely benign by Invitae, and as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, Gene Dx and Counsyl), Clinvitae (5x), and Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (1x). The variant was not identified in Cosmic, and MutDB databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 149 of 277168 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000538 in the following populations: South Asian in 135 of 30782 chromosomes (freq. 0.004), Other in 149 of 6466 chromosomes (freq. 0.00016), European (Non-Finnish) in 11 of 126676 chromosomes (freq. 0.000087), East Asian in 1 of 18858 chromosomes (freq. 0.00005), and Latino in 1 of 34418 chromosomes (freq. 0.000029) (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Arg1035Cys residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioApr 25, 2023- -
Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 25, 2024- -
BRIP1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJul 09, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.087
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.52
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
Cadd
Benign
3.2
Dann
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.065
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.025
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.51
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.077
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0059
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.98
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.21
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.030
N
REVEL
Benign
0.084
Sift
Benign
0.068
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.058
T
Polyphen
0.10
B
Vest4
0.070
MVP
0.39
MPC
0.32
ClinPred
0.053
T
GERP RS
-2.0
Varity_R
0.043
gMVP
0.20

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45437094; hg19: chr17-59761304; COSMIC: COSV51996006; COSMIC: COSV51996006; API