rs45442103
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_194248.3(OTOF):c.5655C>T(p.Arg1885=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0552 in 1,614,042 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,762 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.046 ( 202 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.056 ( 2560 hom. )
Consequence
OTOF
NM_194248.3 synonymous
NM_194248.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0630
Genes affected
OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.44).
BP6
Variant 2-26460909-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-26460909-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 21858.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-26460909-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-26460909-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.063 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0609 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTOF | NM_194248.3 | c.5655C>T | p.Arg1885= | synonymous_variant | 44/47 | ENST00000272371.7 | NP_919224.1 | |
OTOF | NM_194323.3 | c.3354C>T | p.Arg1118= | synonymous_variant | 27/29 | ENST00000339598.8 | NP_919304.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTOF | ENST00000272371.7 | c.5655C>T | p.Arg1885= | synonymous_variant | 44/47 | 1 | NM_194248.3 | ENSP00000272371 | A1 | |
OTOF | ENST00000339598.8 | c.3354C>T | p.Arg1118= | synonymous_variant | 27/29 | 1 | NM_194323.3 | ENSP00000344521 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0456 AC: 6942AN: 152160Hom.: 202 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
6942
AN:
152160
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0458 AC: 11508AN: 251370Hom.: 318 AF XY: 0.0468 AC XY: 6366AN XY: 135888
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
11508
AN:
251370
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
6366
AN XY:
135888
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0562 AC: 82102AN: 1461764Hom.: 2560 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.0556 AC XY: 40449AN XY: 727196
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
82102
AN:
1461764
Hom.:
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
AC XY:
40449
AN XY:
727196
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0456 AC: 6939AN: 152278Hom.: 202 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0448 AC XY: 3339AN XY: 74458
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
6939
AN:
152278
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3339
AN XY:
74458
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
42
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 09, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 15, 2007 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Aug 10, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9 Benign:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | GeneReviews | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at