rs45478892
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.1281C>A(p.Ile427Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.003 in 1,611,964 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0031 ( 10 hom. )
Consequence
TSC2
NM_000548.5 synonymous
NM_000548.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.178
Genes affected
TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 16-2062520-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2062520-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 49685.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-2062520-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr16-2062520-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.178 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00191 (291/152352) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00332 (226/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00297. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 129 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 291 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | NM_000548.5 | c.1281C>A | p.Ile427Ile | synonymous_variant | 13/42 | ENST00000219476.9 | NP_000539.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | ENST00000219476.9 | c.1281C>A | p.Ile427Ile | synonymous_variant | 13/42 | 5 | NM_000548.5 | ENSP00000219476.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00191 AC: 291AN: 152234Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
291
AN:
152234
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00175 AC: 433AN: 246874Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00168 AC XY: 225AN XY: 133706
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
433
AN:
246874
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
225
AN XY:
133706
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00311 AC: 4542AN: 1459612Hom.: 10 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00295 AC XY: 2140AN XY: 725788
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
4542
AN:
1459612
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
2140
AN XY:
725788
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00191 AC: 291AN: 152352Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00173 AC XY: 129AN XY: 74492
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
291
AN:
152352
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
129
AN XY:
74492
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:22Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:7
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 23, 2016 | Variant summary: The c.1281C>A (p.Ile427=) in TSC2 gene is a synonymous change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is present in the control population dataset of ExAC at frequency of 0.0022 (201/93004 chrs tested), predominantly in individuals of European descent (0.0032; 161/50172). This frequency exceeds the estimated maximum allele frequency for a pathogenic allele in this gene (0.0000068). The variant of interest has been cited as Benign/Likely Benign by multiple reputable databases/clinical laboratories. Taking together, based on the prevalence of this variant in general population the variant was classified as Benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 12, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | TSC2: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jul 13, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 23, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 28, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 08, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Dec 03, 2021 | - - |
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 30, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Sep 20, 2022 | - - |
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:2Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | curation | Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 02, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 12, 2021 | - - |
Lymphangiomyomatosis;C1846385:Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II;C1860707:Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Apr 06, 2022 | - - |
Lymphangiomyomatosis Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | curation | Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2) | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at