rs45484298
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.1318G>A(p.Gly440Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00112 in 1,612,336 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
TSC2
NM_000548.5 missense
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
1
7
11
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 9.59
Genes affected
TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.05455801).
BP6
Variant 16-2062557-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2062557-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 41726.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=11, Benign=3, not_provided=2, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr16-2062557-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr16-2062557-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0011 (168/152340) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.0034 (52/15300). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00266. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 80 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 168 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | NM_000548.5 | c.1318G>A | p.Gly440Ser | missense_variant | 13/42 | ENST00000219476.9 | NP_000539.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | ENST00000219476.9 | c.1318G>A | p.Gly440Ser | missense_variant | 13/42 | 5 | NM_000548.5 | ENSP00000219476 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00110 AC: 168AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
168
AN:
152222
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000693 AC: 171AN: 246904Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000696 AC XY: 93AN XY: 133702
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
171
AN:
246904
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
93
AN XY:
133702
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00112 AC: 1631AN: 1459996Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00106 AC XY: 771AN XY: 726026
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1631
AN:
1459996
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
771
AN XY:
726026
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00110 AC: 168AN: 152340Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00107 AC XY: 80AN XY: 74488
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
168
AN:
152340
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
74488
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
4
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
5
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
14
ExAC
AF:
AC:
76
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:21Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:9
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 24, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jun 20, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 01, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15798777, 10205261, 17304050, 24728327, 22703879) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2024 | TSC2: BS1 - |
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Uncertain:2Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, flagged submission | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Oct 30, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Oct 09, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. Homozygosity has been confirmed in one or more individuals. As homozygosity for pathogenic variants in this gene is generally assumed to result in embryonic lethality, this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Aug 18, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health and Sciences University | Jan 27, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:4Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 24, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 22, 2024 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Dec 15, 2014 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 03, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Apr 21, 2021 | - - |
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | curation | Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, flagged submission | research | Department of Genetics, Reproduction and Fetal Medicine., Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBIS), University Hospital Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/University of Seville. | Apr 01, 2015 | - - |
TSC2-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 01, 2020 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;.;.;.;L;L;.;.;.;L;.;L;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;.;.;N;.;N;.;.;N;N;.;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;.;T
Polyphen
D;.;.;.;P;B;.;.;P;B;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
MVP
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at