Menu
GeneBe

rs45487992

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.4293G>A(p.Ser1431=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00023 in 1,609,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.157
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 16-2084515-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2084515-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 49292.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-2084515-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr16-2084515-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.157 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00104 (158/152346) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00354 (147/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00307. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 73 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 156 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TSC2NM_000548.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.4293G>A p.Ser1431= synonymous_variant 34/42 ENST00000219476.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TSC2ENST00000219476.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.4293G>A p.Ser1431= synonymous_variant 34/425 NM_000548.5 P49815-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00102
AC:
156
AN:
152228
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00350
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000392
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000273
AC:
65
AN:
237826
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000253
AC XY:
33
AN XY:
130248
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00342
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000333
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000563
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000172
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000146
AC:
212
AN:
1456840
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000142
AC XY:
103
AN XY:
724654
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00329
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000248
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000549
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000399
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00104
AC:
158
AN:
152346
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000980
AC XY:
73
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00354
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000392
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.000532
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00117

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 01, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 23, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 26, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2023TSC2: BP4, BP7, BS1 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsNov 29, 2018- -
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:2Other:1
not provided, no classification providedcurationTuberous sclerosis database (TSC2)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabNov 07, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 12, 2016This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Oct 22, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
Cadd
Benign
1.5
Dann
Benign
0.76
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.2

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.050
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45487992; hg19: chr16-2134516; API