rs45514002
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_007078.3(LDB3):c.2017G>A(p.Asp673Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000142 in 1,614,022 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
LDB3
NM_007078.3 missense
NM_007078.3 missense
Scores
4
8
5
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 10.0
Genes affected
LDB3 (HGNC:15710): (LIM domain binding 3) This gene encodes a PDZ domain-containing protein. PDZ motifs are modular protein-protein interaction domains consisting of 80-120 amino acid residues. PDZ domain-containing proteins interact with each other in cytoskeletal assembly or with other proteins involved in targeting and clustering of membrane proteins. The protein encoded by this gene interacts with alpha-actinin-2 through its N-terminal PDZ domain and with protein kinase C via its C-terminal LIM domains. The LIM domain is a cysteine-rich motif defined by 50-60 amino acids containing two zinc-binding modules. This protein also interacts with all three members of the myozenin family. Mutations in this gene have been associated with myofibrillar myopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified; all isoforms have N-terminal PDZ domains while only longer isoforms (1, 2 and 5) have C-terminal LIM domains. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.07926795).
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000985 (15/152260) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00232 (12/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00134. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 8 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 15 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDB3 | NM_007078.3 | c.2017G>A | p.Asp673Asn | missense_variant | 13/14 | ENST00000361373.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDB3 | ENST00000361373.9 | c.2017G>A | p.Asp673Asn | missense_variant | 13/14 | 1 | NM_007078.3 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152140Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152140
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000107 AC: 27AN: 251470Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000957 AC XY: 13AN XY: 135906
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
27
AN:
251470
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
135906
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000146 AC: 214AN: 1461762Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000144 AC XY: 105AN XY: 727176
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
214
AN:
1461762
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
105
AN XY:
727176
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000985 AC: 15AN: 152260Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000107 AC XY: 8AN XY: 74460
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152260
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74460
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
21
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:2Uncertain:2Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1C Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | May 01, 2006 | - - |
Left ventricular noncompaction 3 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | May 01, 2006 | - - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1C;C4721886:Myofibrillar myopathy 4 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Dec 10, 2021 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 30, 2020 | Previously reported to segregate with DCM and LVNC (reported at D626N due to alternative nomenclature) in multiple unrelated families int he published literature (Arimura et al., 2004; Xing et al., 2006; Hata et al., 2016); Previously reported in a patient with epilepsy who experienced sudden death and who was found to have mild hyper-trabeculation of left ventricle and dilatation of right ventricle on autopsy; this individual also harbored a variant in another cardiac-related gene (Hata et al., 2016); Reported in ClinVar as a variant of uncertain significance (ClinVar Variant ID# 4735; Landrum et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 14660611, 16427346, 23558691, 27135274, 31024045) - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 4 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 17, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Pathogenic
Dann
Pathogenic
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;.;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationTaster
Benign
A;A;A;A;A;A
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D;.;D;D;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;T
Polyphen
1.0, 1.0
.;.;D;D;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at