rs45517171

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):​c.1387A>G​(p.Ile463Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00103 in 1,551,272 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I463M) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00067 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 missense

Scores

9
10

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.55

Publications

18 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
TSC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • tuberous sclerosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • tuberous sclerosis 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
  • lymphangioleiomyomatosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • tuberous sclerosis complex
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 8 benign, 31 uncertain in NM_000548.5
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.028308928).
BP6
Variant 16-2062997-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2062997-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 49674.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00067 (102/152320) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.0015 (23/15302). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00103. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 39 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 102 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TSC2NM_000548.5 linkc.1387A>G p.Ile463Val missense_variant Exon 14 of 42 ENST00000219476.9 NP_000539.2 P49815-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TSC2ENST00000219476.9 linkc.1387A>G p.Ile463Val missense_variant Exon 14 of 42 5 NM_000548.5 ENSP00000219476.3 P49815-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000670
AC:
102
AN:
152202
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00100
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000500
AC:
78
AN:
156114
AF XY:
0.000499
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000808
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000783
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00107
AC:
1491
AN:
1398952
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00109
AC XY:
753
AN XY:
690014
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000285
AC:
9
AN:
31590
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000308
AC:
11
AN:
35700
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25170
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
35734
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
2
AN:
79232
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000530
AC:
26
AN:
49058
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5626
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00128
AC:
1378
AN:
1078858
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00112
AC:
65
AN:
57984
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
99
198
296
395
494
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
58
116
174
232
290
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000670
AC:
102
AN:
152320
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000524
AC XY:
39
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000144
AC:
6
AN:
41582
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00150
AC:
23
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000941
AC:
1
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00100
AC:
68
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.491
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
5
11
16
22
27
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000902
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000895
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000778
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000254
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00159
AC:
12
ExAC
AF:
0.000112
AC:
7
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Dec 27, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 02, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23514105, 10205261, 24728327) -

Feb 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

TSC2: BS1, BS2 -

Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 14, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. Homozygosity has been confirmed in one or more individuals. As homozygosity for pathogenic variants in this gene is generally assumed to result in embryonic lethality, this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. -

Nov 07, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2Other:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

- -

Nov 14, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:2Other:1
Aug 31, 2022
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

-
Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2)
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:curation

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Nov 01, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Sep 24, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.11
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.010
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.37
T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.32
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.43
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.064
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.028
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.032
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.6
L;.;.;.;L;L;.;.;.;L;.;L;.;.;.
PhyloP100
8.6
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.60
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.38
N;.;.;N;.;N;.;.;N;N;.;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.45
Sift
Benign
0.23
T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.32
T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;.;T
Polyphen
0.88
P;.;.;.;P;B;.;.;P;B;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.57
MVP
0.51
ClinPred
0.12
T
GERP RS
5.2
PromoterAI
0.012
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.065
gMVP
0.14
Mutation Taster
=58/42
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45517171; hg19: chr16-2112998; COSMIC: COSV54775853; API