rs45525041

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.2919G>A​(p.Ser973Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000308 in 1,611,690 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S973S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00016 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00032 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:24

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.315

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • medulloblastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).
BP6
Variant 13-32337274-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32337274-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 51370.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.315 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkc.2919G>A p.Ser973Ser synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkc.2919G>A p.Ser973Ser synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 27 5 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkc.2550G>A p.Ser850Ser synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 27 1 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.2919G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000158
AC:
24
AN:
152028
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000221
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000358
AC:
89
AN:
248942
AF XY:
0.000438
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000205
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000301
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000323
AC:
472
AN:
1459544
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000369
AC XY:
268
AN XY:
725998
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000301
AC:
1
AN:
33270
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000226
AC:
10
AN:
44284
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26056
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000505
AC:
2
AN:
39626
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
122
AN:
85668
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53328
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00226
AC:
13
AN:
5748
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000275
AC:
306
AN:
1111298
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000299
AC:
18
AN:
60266
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
26
52
77
103
129
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000158
AC:
24
AN:
152146
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000175
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
74382
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41536
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15266
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00145
AC:
7
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10574
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000221
AC:
15
AN:
67992
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.519
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
3
4
6
7
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000213
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000174
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:24
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 29, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 18, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The BRCA2 c.2919G>A (p.Ser973Ser) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 54/120514 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the South Asian subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0017597 (29/16480). This frequency is about 2.35 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRCA2 variant (0.0007503), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of South Asian origin. This variant is known to co-occur with multupe deleterious variants in literature (Lara_Biol Res_2012) and in UMD (BRCA1 c.5123C>A (p.Ala1708Glu), c.5266dup (p.Gln1756ProfsX74), c.2722G>T (p.Glu908X), and c.3485delA (p.Asp1162ValfsX48) and BRCA2 c.1184G>A (p.Trp395X)), strongly supporting for a benign outcome. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases have classified this variant as benign/likely beign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -

Jul 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BRCA2: BP4, BP7 -

-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:4
Jun 29, 2017
Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to alter mRNA splicing (splicing prior 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/) and frequency 0.0018 (South Asian), derived from ExAC (2014-12-17). -

Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Nov 24, 2014
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Mar 02, 2020
BRCAlab, Lund University
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 24, 2003
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:4
Feb 06, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 18, 2022
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 18, 2017
Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Jun 01, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 28, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 07, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 16, 2021
National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 10, 2023
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Jun 15, 2020
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.Ser973= variant was identified in 4 of 3750 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from Spanish, Cypriot, Greek, Italian and American individuals or families with FCCX (familial crc type X), and breast/ovarian (sporadic and familial) cancers and was not identified in 100 chromosomes from healthy individuals (Garre 2015, Hadjisavvas 2004, Konstantopoulou 2007, Minucci 2015, Borg 2010). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs45525041) “With other allele”, ClinVar (classified benign, reviewed by an expert panel (June 2017); submitters: benign by ENIGMA, Invitae, GeneDx and Baylor Miraca Genetics Laboratories; likely benign by Ambry Genetics, CHEO, Counsyl, Illumina; and uncertain significance by BIC), Clinvitae (6x), LOVD 3.0 (1x), UMD-LSDB (36x as 3-uv, co-occurring with BRCA1 pathogenic variants: c.5123C>A; p.Ala1708Glu, c.5266dup; p.Gln1756ProfsX74, c.2722G>T; p.Glu908X), and BIC Database (1x, clinical importance unknown, classification pending). The variant was not identified in COGR, Cosmic, ARUP Laboratories, and Zhejiang Colon Cancer Databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 88 of 275074 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include Latino in 7 of 34050 chromosomes (freq. 0.0002), European Non-Finnish in 33 of 125900 chromosomes (freq. 0.0003), and South Asian in 48 of 30236 chromosomes (freq. 0.002); it was not seen in the East Asian, African, other, Ashkenazi Jewish, and European Finnish populations. The p.Ser973= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Feb 23, 2017
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.90
CADD
Benign
1.0
DANN
Benign
0.34
PhyloP100
0.32
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45525041; hg19: chr13-32911411; API