rs45540031
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_024596.5(MCPH1):āc.2401A>Gā(p.Ser801Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00249 in 1,614,216 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024596.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCPH1 | NM_024596.5 | c.2401A>G | p.Ser801Gly | missense_variant | 13/14 | ENST00000344683.10 | NP_078872.3 | |
MCPH1-AS1 | NR_125386.1 | n.230-5T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCPH1 | ENST00000344683.10 | c.2401A>G | p.Ser801Gly | missense_variant | 13/14 | 1 | NM_024596.5 | ENSP00000342924 | P1 | |
MCPH1-AS1 | ENST00000661193.1 | n.1055-1416T>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00212 AC: 322AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00255 AC: 635AN: 249502Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00233 AC XY: 316AN XY: 135376
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00252 AC: 3691AN: 1461888Hom.: 7 Cov.: 51 AF XY: 0.00237 AC XY: 1724AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00211 AC: 322AN: 152328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00213 AC XY: 159AN XY: 74488
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 23, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Dec 01, 2022 | MCPH1: BP4, BS2 - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 02, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 19, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Microcephaly 1, primary, autosomal recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at