Menu
GeneBe

rs45553236

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_000245.4(MET):c.2216G>A(p.Arg739His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000384 in 1,613,508 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R739C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000038 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MET
NM_000245.4 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0500
Variant links:
Genes affected
MET (HGNC:7029): (MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins and the product of the proto-oncogene MET. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that are linked via disulfide bonds to form the mature receptor. Further processing of the beta subunit results in the formation of the M10 peptide, which has been shown to reduce lung fibrosis. Binding of its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor, induces dimerization and activation of the receptor, which plays a role in cellular survival, embryogenesis, and cellular migration and invasion. Mutations in this gene are associated with papillary renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and various head and neck cancers. Amplification and overexpression of this gene are also associated with multiple human cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.052493542).
BP6
Variant 7-116758572-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-116758572-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 135963.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=1, Likely_benign=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000461 (7/151974) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.000833 (4/4800). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000284. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 4 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
METNM_000245.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2216G>A p.Arg739His missense_variant 9/21 ENST00000397752.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
METENST00000397752.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.2216G>A p.Arg739His missense_variant 9/211 NM_000245.4 P3P08581-1
METENST00000318493.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.2216G>A p.Arg739His missense_variant 9/211 A2P08581-2
METENST00000436117.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2216G>A p.Arg739His missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 9/201 P08581-3
METENST00000422097.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2216G>A p.Arg739His missense_variant 9/123

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000461
AC:
7
AN:
151974
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000242
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000656
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000833
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000843
AC:
21
AN:
249196
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000962
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
135204
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000580
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000557
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000354
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000376
AC:
55
AN:
1461534
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000523
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
727076
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000895
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000452
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000809
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000461
AC:
7
AN:
151974
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000539
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74222
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000242
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000656
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000833
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000959
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000227
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000274
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000108
AC:
13
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 19, 2023In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Renal cell carcinoma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 11, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 12, 2022This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.089
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.34
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.40
Cadd
Benign
15
Dann
Benign
0.87
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.52
D;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.0
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.24
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.052
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.052
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.62
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
2.0
M;M;M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.18
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
D;D;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.11
Sift
Benign
0.091
T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.098
T;T;D;D
Polyphen
0.77
P;B;.;.
Vest4
0.24
MVP
0.66
MPC
0.47
ClinPred
0.053
T
GERP RS
-7.8
Varity_R
0.13
gMVP
0.69

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45553236; hg19: chr7-116398626; API