rs45557242

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000022.4(ADA):c.162G>A(p.Lys54Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00346 in 1,614,236 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0027 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0035 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

ADA
NM_000022.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.648

Variant links:

Genes affected

ADA (HGNC:186): (adenosine deaminase) This gene encodes an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of adenosine to inosine in the purine catabolic pathway. Various mutations have been described for this gene and have been linked to human diseases related to impaired immune function such as severe combined immunodeficiency disease (SCID) which is the result of a deficiency in the ADA enzyme. In ADA-deficient individuals there is a marked depletion of T, B, and NK lymphocytes, and consequently, a lack of both humoral and cellular immunity. Conversely, elevated levels of this enzyme are associated with congenital hemolytic anemia. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2019]

ADA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.41).

BP6

Variant 20-44629103-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-44629103-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 338510.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr20-44629103-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.648 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00274 (418/152354) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0036 (245/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00323. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 199 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ADA	NM_000022.4 link	c.162G>A	p.Lys54Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 12	ENST00000372874.9	NP_000013.2	P00813A0A0S2Z381
ADA	NM_001322051.2 link	c.162G>A	p.Lys54Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 11		NP_001308980.1	F5GWI4
ADA	NM_001322050.2 link	c.-128G>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 3 of 11		NP_001308979.1
ADA	NR_136160.2 link	n.254G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 3 of 11

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ADA	ENST00000372874.9 link	c.162G>A	p.Lys54Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 12	1	NM_000022.4	ENSP00000361965.4	P00813
ADA	ENST00000695995.1 link	c.162G>A	p.Lys54Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 9			ENSP00000512318.1	A0A8Q3SI64
ADA	ENST00000695991.1 link	c.162G>A	p.Lys54Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 8			ENSP00000512314.1	A0A0S2Z3B9
ADA	ENST00000696038.1 link	n.162G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 3 of 9			ENSP00000512344.1	A0A8Q3SJ57

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00275

AC:

418

AN:

152236

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000579

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.0143

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00157

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000576

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00186

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00885

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00360

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00334

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00322

AC:

810

AN:

251454

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00330

AC XY:

448

AN XY:

135920

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000369

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000983

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000694

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00216

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00776

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00443

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00391

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00353

AC:

5163

AN:

1461882

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00357

AC XY:

2594

AN XY:

727242

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000269

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000850

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000421

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00204

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00766

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00390

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00281

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00274

AC:

418

AN:

152354

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00267

AC XY:

199

AN XY:

74494

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000577

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00157

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000576

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00186

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00885

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00360

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00331

Alfa

AF:

0.00338

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00235

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00344

EpiControl

AF:

0.00480

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Severe combined immunodeficiency, autosomal recessive, T cell-negative, B cell-negative, NK cell-negative, due to adenosine deaminase deficiency

Benign:6

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 18, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Jun 28, 2017

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 25, 2016

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Mar 06, 2020

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

ADA: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

Dec 21, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Jul 21, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

ADA-related disorder

Benign:1

May 17, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.41

CADD

Benign

4.6

DANN

Benign

0.73

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over