rs45591834
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_007078.3(LDB3):c.147G>A(p.Val49Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00401 in 1,614,180 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0031 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0041 ( 23 hom. )
Consequence
LDB3
NM_007078.3 synonymous
NM_007078.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.27
Genes affected
LDB3 (HGNC:15710): (LIM domain binding 3) This gene encodes a PDZ domain-containing protein. PDZ motifs are modular protein-protein interaction domains consisting of 80-120 amino acid residues. PDZ domain-containing proteins interact with each other in cytoskeletal assembly or with other proteins involved in targeting and clustering of membrane proteins. The protein encoded by this gene interacts with alpha-actinin-2 through its N-terminal PDZ domain and with protein kinase C via its C-terminal LIM domains. The LIM domain is a cysteine-rich motif defined by 50-60 amino acids containing two zinc-binding modules. This protein also interacts with all three members of the myozenin family. Mutations in this gene have been associated with myofibrillar myopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified; all isoforms have N-terminal PDZ domains while only longer isoforms (1, 2 and 5) have C-terminal LIM domains. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP6
Variant 10-86679420-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-86679420-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 45524.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-86679420-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-86679420-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.27 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00306 (466/152326) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00475 (323/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00432. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 214 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 466 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDB3 | NM_007078.3 | c.147G>A | p.Val49Val | synonymous_variant | 3/14 | ENST00000361373.9 | NP_009009.1 | |
LDB3 | NM_001368067.1 | c.147G>A | p.Val49Val | synonymous_variant | 3/9 | ENST00000263066.11 | NP_001354996.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDB3 | ENST00000361373.9 | c.147G>A | p.Val49Val | synonymous_variant | 3/14 | 1 | NM_007078.3 | ENSP00000355296.3 | ||
LDB3 | ENST00000263066.11 | c.147G>A | p.Val49Val | synonymous_variant | 3/9 | 1 | NM_001368067.1 | ENSP00000263066.7 | ||
ENSG00000289258 | ENST00000443292.2 | c.1656G>A | p.Val552Val | synonymous_variant | 13/18 | 1 | ENSP00000393132.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00306 AC: 466AN: 152208Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
466
AN:
152208
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00298 AC: 750AN: 251426Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00307 AC XY: 417AN XY: 135902
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
750
AN:
251426
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
417
AN XY:
135902
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00411 AC: 6002AN: 1461854Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00403 AC XY: 2929AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
6002
AN:
1461854
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2929
AN XY:
727232
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00306 AC: 466AN: 152326Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00287 AC XY: 214AN XY: 74490
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
466
AN:
152326
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
214
AN XY:
74490
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 14, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 19, 2012 | Val49Val in Exon 02 of LDB3: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within t he splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 0.4% (27/7020) of Europe an American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Pr oject (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs45591834). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 17, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 11, 2021 | Variant summary: LDB3 c.147G>A alters a conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.003 in 251426 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 119 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in LDB3 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.147G>A in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Co-occurrence with another likely pathogenic variant has been reported (TTN c.43732C>T, p.Gln14578Ter) in our internal database, providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Four ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as likely benign/benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | LDB3: BP4, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 28, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Oct 16, 2015 | - - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
LDB3-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 14, 2022 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 03, 2015 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at