rs4639950
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_031433.4(MFRP):āc.355A>Gā(p.Ile119Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00283 in 1,613,524 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 119 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_031433.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFRP | NM_031433.4 | c.355A>G | p.Ile119Val | missense_variant | 4/15 | ENST00000619721.6 | NP_113621.1 | |
C1QTNF5 | NM_015645.5 | c.-2282A>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 4/15 | NP_056460.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFRP | ENST00000619721.6 | c.355A>G | p.Ile119Val | missense_variant | 4/15 | 1 | NM_031433.4 | ENSP00000481824 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0147 AC: 2233AN: 151730Hom.: 66 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00405 AC: 1003AN: 247844Hom.: 33 AF XY: 0.00284 AC XY: 382AN XY: 134428
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00159 AC: 2328AN: 1461676Hom.: 52 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.00138 AC XY: 1002AN XY: 727118
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0147 AC: 2238AN: 151848Hom.: 67 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0147 AC XY: 1091AN XY: 74234
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Isolated microphthalmia 5 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 26, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 23, 2015 | - - |
Nanophthalmos 2;C1970236:Isolated microphthalmia 5 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Mar 31, 2022 | - - |
Retinal degeneration Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Late-onset retinal degeneration Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at