rs4732748
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001017420.3(ESCO2):c.239C>T(p.Ala80Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.102 in 1,613,932 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9,316 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A80A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001017420.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESCO2 | NM_001017420.3 | c.239C>T | p.Ala80Val | missense_variant | 3/11 | ENST00000305188.13 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESCO2 | ENST00000305188.13 | c.239C>T | p.Ala80Val | missense_variant | 3/11 | 1 | NM_001017420.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.105 AC: 15983AN: 152088Hom.: 944 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.115 AC: 28663AN: 250260Hom.: 1996 AF XY: 0.118 AC XY: 15955AN XY: 135340
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.101 AC: 148296AN: 1461726Hom.: 8374 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.104 AC XY: 75262AN XY: 727150
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.105 AC: 15972AN: 152206Hom.: 942 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.105 AC XY: 7814AN XY: 74432
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Roberts-SC phocomelia syndrome Benign:3Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | GeneReviews | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 14, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Juberg-Hayward syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at