rs4760600
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_033124.5(DRC2):c.1223A>G(p.Tyr408Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.37 in 1,613,700 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 115,214 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_033124.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- primary ciliary dyskinesia 27Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCDC65 | ENST00000320516.5 | c.1223A>G | p.Tyr408Cys | missense_variant | Exon 8 of 8 | 1 | NM_033124.5 | ENSP00000312706.4 | ||
| ENSG00000272822 | ENST00000398092.4 | c.385-17303T>C | intron_variant | Intron 4 of 4 | 3 | ENSP00000438507.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.326 AC: 49528AN: 151948Hom.: 9098 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.382 AC: 95798AN: 251020 AF XY: 0.373 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.375 AC: 547957AN: 1461636Hom.: 106109 Cov.: 49 AF XY: 0.371 AC XY: 270029AN XY: 727120 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.326 AC: 49545AN: 152064Hom.: 9105 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.329 AC XY: 24482AN XY: 74322 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 27 Benign:2
- -
- -
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at