rs4790235
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000080.4(CHRNE):c.53G>T(p.Gly18Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0314 in 1,614,008 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,014 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G18S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000080.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000080.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRNE | MANE Select | c.53G>T | p.Gly18Val | missense | Exon 2 of 12 | ENSP00000497829.1 | Q04844 | ||
| C17orf107 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.*2224C>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000370770.3 | Q6ZR85 | |||
| CHRNE | c.-881G>T | 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain | Exon 2 of 11 | ENSP00000496907.1 | A0A3B3IRM1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0319 AC: 4852AN: 152026Hom.: 200 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0487 AC: 12243AN: 251414 AF XY: 0.0412 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0313 AC: 45770AN: 1461864Hom.: 1814 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0298 AC XY: 21684AN XY: 727234 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0319 AC: 4860AN: 152144Hom.: 200 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0337 AC XY: 2510AN XY: 74396 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at