rs4820889
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000355.4(TCN2):c.1196G>A(p.Arg399Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0316 in 1,613,750 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,183 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000355.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCN2 | NM_000355.4 | c.1196G>A | p.Arg399Gln | missense_variant | 8/9 | ENST00000215838.8 | NP_000346.2 | |
TCN2 | NM_001184726.2 | c.1115G>A | p.Arg372Gln | missense_variant | 8/9 | NP_001171655.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCN2 | ENST00000215838.8 | c.1196G>A | p.Arg399Gln | missense_variant | 8/9 | 1 | NM_000355.4 | ENSP00000215838 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0505 AC: 7658AN: 151772Hom.: 306 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0320 AC: 8046AN: 251458Hom.: 219 AF XY: 0.0314 AC XY: 4265AN XY: 135902
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0296 AC: 43249AN: 1461860Hom.: 872 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0299 AC XY: 21758AN XY: 727234
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0506 AC: 7686AN: 151890Hom.: 311 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0499 AC XY: 3705AN XY: 74222
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Transcobalamin II deficiency Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect, ClinGen | - | Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 08, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 12107818, 25525159) - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics | May 31, 2018 | This variant is interpreted as a Benign - Stand Alone. The following ACMG Tag(s) were applied: BA1 => Allele frequency is >10% in African population in Exome Aggregation Consortium. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at