rs491567
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_182758.4(WDR72):c.1962+11176T>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.342 in 152,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10,718 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_182758.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- amelogenesis imperfectaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- amelogenesis imperfecta hypomaturation type 2A3Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- amelogenesis imperfecta type 2Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- renal tubular acidosisInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_182758.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WDR72 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1962+11176T>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000353699.5 | Q3MJ13 | |||
| WDR72 | TSL:1 | c.1962+11176T>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000379619.1 | Q3MJ13 | |||
| WDR72 | TSL:5 | c.1992+11176T>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000452765.1 | H0YKE0 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.341 AC: 51878AN: 152006Hom.: 10664 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.342 AC: 51997AN: 152122Hom.: 10718 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.346 AC XY: 25756AN XY: 74364 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at