rs4986763
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):āc.3411T>Cā(p.Tyr1137=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.593 in 1,612,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 287,326 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.61 ( 28414 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š: 0.59 ( 258912 hom. )
Consequence
BRIP1
NM_032043.3 synonymous
NM_032043.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.27
Genes affected
BRIP1 (HGNC:20473): (BRCA1 interacting helicase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RecQ DEAH helicase family and interacts with the BRCT repeats of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). The bound complex is important in the normal double-strand break repair function of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). This gene may be a target of germline cancer-inducing mutations. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
BP6
Variant 17-61683635-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-61683635-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 183702.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-61683635-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=3.28 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.723 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | NM_032043.3 | c.3411T>C | p.Tyr1137= | synonymous_variant | 20/20 | ENST00000259008.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | ENST00000259008.7 | c.3411T>C | p.Tyr1137= | synonymous_variant | 20/20 | 1 | NM_032043.3 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.605 AC: 91875AN: 151900Hom.: 28379 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
91875
AN:
151900
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.599 AC: 149716AN: 249818Hom.: 46517 AF XY: 0.586 AC XY: 79261AN XY: 135268
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
149716
AN:
249818
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
79261
AN XY:
135268
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.592 AC: 863884AN: 1460052Hom.: 258912 Cov.: 56 AF XY: 0.587 AC XY: 426155AN XY: 726384
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
863884
AN:
1460052
Hom.:
Cov.:
56
AF XY:
AC XY:
426155
AN XY:
726384
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.605 AC: 91973AN: 152020Hom.: 28414 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.600 AC XY: 44569AN XY: 74328
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
91973
AN:
152020
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
44569
AN XY:
74328
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1854
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 29, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | curation | Leiden Open Variation Database | Aug 13, 2019 | Curator: Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitters to LOVD: Maximiliano Zeballos, Yukihide Momozawa. - |
Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Mar 23, 2022 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 18, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 11, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 31, 2015 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Feb 28, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Ovarian neoplasm Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 18, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at