rs4988347
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The ENST00000259008.7(BRIP1):āc.584T>Cā(p.Leu195Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00224 in 1,613,712 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L195F) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000259008.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | NM_032043.3 | c.584T>C | p.Leu195Pro | missense_variant | 6/20 | ENST00000259008.7 | NP_114432.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | ENST00000259008.7 | c.584T>C | p.Leu195Pro | missense_variant | 6/20 | 1 | NM_032043.3 | ENSP00000259008 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00189 AC: 287AN: 152188Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00194 AC: 487AN: 251340Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00200 AC XY: 271AN XY: 135838
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00228 AC: 3328AN: 1461406Hom.: 6 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00219 AC XY: 1589AN XY: 727042
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00188 AC: 287AN: 152306Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00203 AC XY: 151AN XY: 74478
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:7
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRIP1 p.Leu195Pro variant was identified in 21 of 13772 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals or families with prostate cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and Lynch syndrome and was present in 19 of 21561 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0009) from healthy individuals (Bodian 2014, Kote-Jarai 2009, Kuusisto 2011, Lewis 2005, Rafnar 2011, Ramus 2015, Ray 2009, Rutter 2003, Seal 2006, Yurgelun 2015). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs4988347) as "With Likely benign allele", ClinVar (4x benign, 3x likely benign), Clinvitae, and the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (6x, likely neutral). The variant was not identified in Cosmic or the MutDB database. The variant was identified in control databases in 537 of 277082 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 8 of 24028 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), Other in 10 of 6464 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Latino in 24 of 34414 chromosomes (freq: 0.0007), European in 255 of 126622 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Finnish in 226 of 25772 chromosomes (freq: 0.009), and South Asian in 14 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005). The variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish or East Asian populations. A study by Lewis 2005 utilizing in silico bioinformatic tools predicted this variant may affect mRNA folding and exonic splicing enhancers. However, the same study showed that the variant did not segregate with disease in a family with breast cancer (Lewis 2005). The p.Leu195 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2023 | BRIP1: BP4 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 08, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:4Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Oct 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Mar 11, 2021 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 21, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 29, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Dec 23, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 08, 2017 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 12, 2021 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jul 05, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jan 29, 2019 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Aug 21, 2024 | This variant is considered likely benign. Homozygosity for this variant has been confirmed in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease, indicating that this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Mar 03, 2023 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
BRIP1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 05, 2020 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Ovarian neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jul 05, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at