rs5030317

chr11-32388791-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BA1

The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.*267G>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.372 in 550,248 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 46,812 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.45 (18825 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.34 (27987 hom.)
• Consequence: WT1 NM_024426.6 3_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 1.49

Genes affected

WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
• BP6: Variant 11-32388791-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32388791-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 304410.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
• BA1: GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.753 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
WT1	NM_024426.6	c.*267G>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	10/10	ENST00000452863.10

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
WT1	ENST00000452863.10	c.*267G>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	10/10	1	NM_024426.6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.445 AC: 67565 AN: 151978 Hom.: 18765 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.760

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.263

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.436

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.345

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.725

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.513

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.255

Gnomad MID AF: 0.415

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.266

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.434

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.345 AC: 137273 AN: 398152 Hom.: 27987 Cov.: 5 AF XY: 0.350 AC XY: 72834 AN XY: 208006

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.760

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.442

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.357

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.680

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.488

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.243

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.263

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.363

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.445 AC: 67685 AN: 152096 Hom.: 18825 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.447 AC XY: 33219 AN XY: 74322

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.760

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.437

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.345

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.725

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.513

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.255

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.265

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.442

Alfa AF: 0.349 Hom.: 1599

Bravo AF: 0.472

Asia WGS AF: 0.656 AC: 2281 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

Meacham syndrome Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Dec 05, 2021	- -

Nephrotic syndrome, type 4 Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Dec 05, 2021	- -

Wilms tumor 1 Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Dec 05, 2021	- -

Frasier syndrome Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genome-Nilou Lab

Dec 05, 2021

- -

Drash syndrome Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genome-Nilou Lab

Dec 05, 2021

- -

not provided Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Aug 09, 2018

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.83
Cadd	Benign	8.4
Dann	Benign	0.57

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs5030317; hg19: chr11-32410337;