rs5030672
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PS1_ModerateBP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000211.5(ITGB2):c.1756C>T(p.Arg586Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00845 in 1,612,570 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 128 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Likely pathogenic in UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000211.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITGB2 | NM_000211.5 | c.1756C>T | p.Arg586Trp | missense_variant | 13/16 | ENST00000652462.1 | NP_000202.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITGB2 | ENST00000652462.1 | c.1756C>T | p.Arg586Trp | missense_variant | 13/16 | NM_000211.5 | ENSP00000498780.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00793 AC: 1206AN: 152134Hom.: 23 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00859 AC: 2124AN: 247144Hom.: 36 AF XY: 0.00879 AC XY: 1181AN XY: 134374
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00851 AC: 12428AN: 1460320Hom.: 105 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00829 AC XY: 6024AN XY: 726508
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00791 AC: 1204AN: 152250Hom.: 23 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0104 AC XY: 772AN XY: 74444
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Dec 01, 2022 | ITGB2: BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 05, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22134107, 22995991, 20981092, 1346613, 28600779) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Leukocyte adhesion deficiency 1 Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
ITGB2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 13, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at