rs5187

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2

The NM_000685.5(AGTR1):​c.*93A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00173 in 1,515,112 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 24 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0088 ( 13 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00095 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

AGTR1
NM_000685.5 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, single submitter B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.94

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
AGTR1 (HGNC:336): (angiotensin II receptor type 1) Angiotensin II is a potent vasopressor hormone and a primary regulator of aldosterone secretion. It is an important effector controlling blood pressure and volume in the cardiovascular system. It acts through at least two types of receptors. This gene encodes the type 1 receptor which is thought to mediate the major cardiovascular effects of angiotensin II. This gene may play a role in the generation of reperfusion arrhythmias following restoration of blood flow to ischemic or infarcted myocardium. It was previously thought that a related gene, denoted as AGTR1B, existed; however, it is now believed that there is only one type 1 receptor gene in humans. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2020]
AGTR1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • renal tubular dysgenesis of genetic origin
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • essential hypertension, genetic
    Inheritance: Unknown Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.95).
BP6
Variant 3-148742208-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-148742208-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 901433.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00876 (1334/152308) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0306 (1270/41556). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0292. There are 13 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 623 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 13 AR,Unknown gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
AGTR1NM_000685.5 linkc.*93A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 3 of 3 ENST00000349243.8 NP_000676.1 P30556Q53YY0

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
AGTR1ENST00000349243.8 linkc.*93A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 3 of 3 1 NM_000685.5 ENSP00000273430.3 P30556

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00875
AC:
1331
AN:
152190
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0306
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00268
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00621
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00210
AC:
521
AN:
248272
AF XY:
0.00162
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0293
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00168
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000891
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00132
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000946
AC:
1289
AN:
1362804
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
0.000841
AC XY:
575
AN XY:
683618
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0282
AC:
878
AN:
31150
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00197
AC:
88
AN:
44578
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25544
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39196
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000108
AC:
9
AN:
83688
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53348
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00125
AC:
7
AN:
5584
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000187
AC:
191
AN:
1022508
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00203
AC:
116
AN:
57208
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
68
135
203
270
338
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
30
60
90
120
150
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00876
AC:
1334
AN:
152308
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00836
AC XY:
623
AN XY:
74486
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0306
AC:
1270
AN:
41556
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00268
AC:
41
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000132
AC:
9
AN:
68016
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00614
AC:
13
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
65
131
196
262
327
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00505
Hom.:
9
Bravo
AF:
0.00993
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Renal tubular dysgenesis Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.95
CADD
Benign
0.065
DANN
Benign
0.37
PhyloP100
-1.9
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs5187; hg19: chr3-148459995; API