rs528535500

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_000455.5(STK11):c.537G>A(p.Pro179Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000118 in 1,606,732 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

STK11
NM_000455.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.57

Variant links:

Genes affected

STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

STK11 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).

BP6

Variant 19-1220445-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1220445-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 187230.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.57 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 16 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
STK11	NM_000455.5 link	c.537G>A	p.Pro179Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 10	ENST00000326873.12	NP_000446.1	Q15831-1A0A0S2Z4D1
STK11	NM_001407255.1 link	c.537G>A	p.Pro179Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 9		NP_001394184.1
STK11	NR_176325.1 link	n.1804G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 5 of 11

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
STK11	ENST00000326873.12 link	c.537G>A	p.Pro179Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 10	1	NM_000455.5	ENSP00000324856.6	Q15831-1
STK11	ENST00000652231.1 link	c.537G>A	p.Pro179Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 9			ENSP00000498804.1	Q15831-2
STK11	ENST00000585748.3 link	c.165G>A	p.Pro55Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 12	3		ENSP00000477641.2	A0A087WT72

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152184

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000127

AC:

AN:

235520

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000156

AC XY:

AN XY:

128098

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000719

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000579

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000494

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000110

AC:

AN:

1454548

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000152

AC XY:

AN XY:

722950

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000599

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000193

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000902

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000333

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152184

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74340

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.0000151

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

Benign:6

Oct 13, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 12, 2023

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 26, 2018

Counsyl

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The STK11 p.Pro179= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the LOVD 3.0, database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs528535500) as â€šÃ„Ãºwith likely benign, other alleleâ€šÃ„Ã¹ and ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae, Color, Ambry Genetics and 2 other submitters and benign by GeneDx). The variant was identified in control databases in 3 of 235,520 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00001 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 13,916 chromosomes (freq: 0.000072), East Asian in 1 of 17,286 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006), Finnish in 1 of 20,240 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005), while the variant was not observed in the Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, European, Other and South Asian populations. The p.Pro179= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The variant occurs at a non-highly conserved nucleotide outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Jul 29, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Apr 27, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 02, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 10, 2022

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Aug 14, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Jan 16, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.92

CADD

Benign

0.097

DANN

Benign

0.91

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over