rs529010293

chr14-102044348-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):c.12759C>T(p.Gly4253=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000149 in 1,613,862 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC1H1
NM_001376.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.771

Variant links:

Genes affected

DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

DYNC1H1 links:

(HGNC:):

links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.24).

BP6

Variant 14-102044348-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-102044348-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 312658.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.771 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000591 (9/152342) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00124 (6/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000541. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 4 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd at 9 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
DYNC1H1	NM_001376.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.12759C>T	p.Gly4253=	synonymous_variant	71/78	ENST00000360184.10

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
DYNC1H1	ENST00000360184.10 linkuse as main transcript	c.12759C>T	p.Gly4253=	synonymous_variant	71/78	1	NM_001376.5	P1
	ENST00000553701.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.346+6097G>A		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant		3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152224

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000216

AC:

AN:

250308

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000281

AC XY:

AN XY:

135446

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000580

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00147

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000619

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000158

AC:

231

AN:

1461520

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000193

AC XY:

140

AN XY:

727092

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000671

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00173

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000594

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000182

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152342

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000537

AC XY:

AN XY:

74494

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000712

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000378

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Dec 06, 2023	- -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Nov 17, 2015

- -

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.24

Cadd

Benign

5.4

Dann

Benign

0.89

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.92

RBP_regulation_power_radar

2.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over