rs535217359
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_017617.5(NOTCH1):c.687C>T(p.Asn229=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000253 in 1,542,144 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000027 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
NOTCH1
NM_017617.5 synonymous
NM_017617.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.698
Genes affected
NOTCH1 (HGNC:7881): (notch receptor 1) This gene encodes a member of the NOTCH family of proteins. Members of this Type I transmembrane protein family share structural characteristics including an extracellular domain consisting of multiple epidermal growth factor-like (EGF) repeats, and an intracellular domain consisting of multiple different domain types. Notch signaling is an evolutionarily conserved intercellular signaling pathway that regulates interactions between physically adjacent cells through binding of Notch family receptors to their cognate ligands. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed in the trans-Golgi network to generate two polypeptide chains that heterodimerize to form the mature cell-surface receptor. This receptor plays a role in the development of numerous cell and tissue types. Mutations in this gene are associated with aortic valve disease, Adams-Oliver syndrome, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).
BP6
?
Variant 9-136522905-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-136522905-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 415436.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.698 with no splicing effect.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 37 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOTCH1 | NM_017617.5 | c.687C>T | p.Asn229= | synonymous_variant | 4/34 | ENST00000651671.1 | |
LOC124902310 | XR_007061865.1 | n.508-413G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | ||||
NOTCH1 | XM_011518717.3 | c.20-3340C>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOTCH1 | ENST00000651671.1 | c.687C>T | p.Asn229= | synonymous_variant | 4/34 | NM_017617.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152238
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000331 AC: 5AN: 151014Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000490 AC XY: 4AN XY: 81638
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
151014
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
81638
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000266 AC: 37AN: 1389788Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000293 AC XY: 20AN XY: 683752
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
37
AN:
1389788
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
683752
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152356Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74502
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152356
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74502
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Adams-Oliver syndrome 5 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Oct 23, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Mar 15, 2022 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 13, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 09, 2024 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Aortic valve disease 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Mar 15, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at