rs536282050

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000455.5(STK11):​c.597+14delA variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000657 in 1,596,188 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00068 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00065 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

STK11
NM_000455.5 intron

Scores

Not classified

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.22

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
STK11 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • familial pancreatic carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Peutz-Jeghers syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 19-1220518-TA-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1220518-TA-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 182881.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000683 (104/152198) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00203 (31/15296). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00147. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 43 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 104 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
STK11NM_000455.5 linkc.597+14delA intron_variant Intron 4 of 9 ENST00000326873.12 NP_000446.1 Q15831-1A0A0S2Z4D1
STK11NM_001407255.1 linkc.597+14delA intron_variant Intron 4 of 8 NP_001394184.1
STK11NR_176325.1 linkn.1864+14delA intron_variant Intron 5 of 10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
STK11ENST00000326873.12 linkc.597+14delA intron_variant Intron 4 of 9 1 NM_000455.5 ENSP00000324856.6 Q15831-1
STK11ENST00000652231.1 linkc.597+14delA intron_variant Intron 4 of 8 ENSP00000498804.1 Q15831-2
STK11ENST00000585748.3 linkc.225+14delA intron_variant Intron 6 of 11 3 ENSP00000477641.2 A0A087WT72
STK11ENST00000593219.6 linkn.*422+14delA intron_variant Intron 5 of 10 3 ENSP00000466610.1 K7EMR0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000684
AC:
104
AN:
152078
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000544
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000590
AC:
129
AN:
218518
AF XY:
0.000520
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000239
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00161
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00130
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000186
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000507
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00111
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000654
AC:
945
AN:
1443990
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000652
AC XY:
467
AN XY:
716506
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000452
AC:
15
AN:
33180
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00166
AC:
71
AN:
42834
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00117
AC:
30
AN:
25666
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000180
AC:
7
AN:
38974
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000202
AC:
17
AN:
84158
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
1
AN:
50742
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000524
AC:
3
AN:
5724
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000679
AC:
749
AN:
1103138
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000873
AC:
52
AN:
59574
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
61
122
182
243
304
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
30
60
90
120
150
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000683
AC:
104
AN:
152198
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000578
AC XY:
43
AN XY:
74420
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000722
AC:
30
AN:
41544
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00203
AC:
31
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000414
AC:
2
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10604
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000544
AC:
37
AN:
67960
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000945
AC:
2
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.510
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8
15
23
30
38
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000291
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000695
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 05, 2021
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 19, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

STK11: BS1 -

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Benign:4
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 25, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Feb 21, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The variant is found in BR-OV-HEREDIC,COLO-HEREDIC panel(s). -

Apr 01, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 06, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified Benign:1
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
May 31, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The STK11 c.597+14delA variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, MutDB, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, or Insight Hereditary Tumors Database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs536282050) as “With Likely benign allele,” ClinVar (as benign by GeneDx and likely benign by Illumina, Counsyl, and Color Genomics), Clinvitae (2x as in ClinVar), and LOVD 3.0 (2x as likely benign) databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 1 of 30810 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000032 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 1 of 8678 chromosomes (freq: 0.000115), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), European (Non-Finnish), Latino, Other, and South Asian populations. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic NBN variant (p.Lys233SerfsX5), increasing the likelihood that the c.597+14delA variant does not have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
PhyloP100
-2.2
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs536282050; hg19: chr19-1220517; API