rs538561788

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_020631.6(PLEKHG5):c.2431C>T(p.Arg811Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000127 in 1,611,480 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R811H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

PLEKHG5
NM_020631.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.86

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PLEKHG5 (HGNC:29105): (pleckstrin homology and RhoGEF domain containing G5) This gene encodes a protein that activates the nuclear factor kappa B (NFKB1) signaling pathway. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

PLEKHG5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

neuromuscular disease
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease recessive intermediate C
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, autosomal recessive 4
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics

PLEKHG5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.054827005).

BP6

Variant 1-6468405-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-6468405-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 290013.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000657 (10/152278) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00124 (6/4822). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000542. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 4 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PLEKHG5	NM_020631.6 link	c.2431C>T	p.Arg811Cys	missense_variant	Exon 20 of 21	ENST00000377728.8	NP_065682.2	O94827-5

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PLEKHG5	ENST00000377728.8 link	c.2431C>T	p.Arg811Cys	missense_variant	Exon 20 of 21	2	NM_020631.6	ENSP00000366957.3		O94827-5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000657

AC:

AN:

152160

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000483

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000271

AC:

AN:

243284

AF XY:

0.000355

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000222

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000367

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000168

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000134

AC:

195

AN:

1459202

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000194

AC XY:

141

AN XY:

725846

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000598

AC:

AN:

33456

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000225

AC:

AN:

44394

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26072

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000126

AC:

AN:

39616

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00176

AC:

151

AN:

86036

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52378

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000279

AC:

AN:

1111186

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000829

AC:

AN:

60298

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.495

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000657

AC:

AN:

152278

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000537

AC XY:

AN XY:

74456

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000481

AC:

AN:

41562

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000193

AC:

AN:

5174

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00124

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68004

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.520

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000329

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000491

ExAC

AF:

0.000239

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00318

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2

Jun 21, 2022

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Aug 04, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, autosomal recessive 4;C3809309:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease recessive intermediate C

Benign:1

Nov 11, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.087

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.28

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.18

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.50

.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;D

Eigen

Uncertain

0.21

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.20

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.88

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.89

D;.;D;D;D;D;.;D;D

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.44

MetaRNN

Benign

0.055

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.33

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.8

.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;L

PhyloP100

2.9

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.61

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.4

D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.45

Sift

Benign

0.058

T;T;T;T;T;D;T;T;T

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.020

D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D

Polyphen

1.0

.;.;.;.;D;D;.;.;D

Vest4

0.31

MVP

0.67

MPC

1.1

ClinPred

0.17

GERP RS

3.5

Varity_R

0.16

gMVP

0.55

Mutation Taster

=96/4

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over