rs539081624
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6BP7
The NM_152383.5(DIS3L2):c.1158C>T(p.Thr386Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000669 in 1,613,670 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000068 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
DIS3L2
NM_152383.5 synonymous
NM_152383.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0150
Genes affected
DIS3L2 (HGNC:28648): (DIS3 like 3'-5' exoribonuclease 2) The protein encoded by this gene is similar in sequence to 3'/5' exonucleolytic subunits of the RNA exosome. The exosome is a large multimeric ribonucleotide complex responsible for degrading various RNA substrates. Several transcript variants, some protein-coding and some not, have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.35).
BP6
Variant 2-232210359-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-232210359-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 334935.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.015 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIS3L2 | NM_152383.5 | c.1158C>T | p.Thr386Thr | synonymous_variant | 10/21 | ENST00000325385.12 | NP_689596.4 | |
DIS3L2 | NM_001257281.2 | c.1158C>T | p.Thr386Thr | synonymous_variant | 10/14 | NP_001244210.1 | ||
DIS3L2 | NR_046476.2 | n.1304C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/21 | ||||
DIS3L2 | NR_046477.2 | n.1280C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 9/19 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIS3L2 | ENST00000325385.12 | c.1158C>T | p.Thr386Thr | synonymous_variant | 10/21 | 5 | NM_152383.5 | ENSP00000315569.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
152224
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000361 AC: 9AN: 249532Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000295 AC XY: 4AN XY: 135382
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
249532
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
135382
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000684 AC: 100AN: 1461326Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000660 AC XY: 48AN XY: 726978
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
100
AN:
1461326
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
48
AN XY:
726978
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000525 AC: 8AN: 152344Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74498
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
152344
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74498
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Perlman syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 07, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jan 14, 2022 | - - |
DIS3L2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 12, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at