Menu
GeneBe

rs539823013

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong

The NM_001909.5(CTSD):c.190G>C(p.Glu64Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,566 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E64K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CTSD
NM_001909.5 missense

Scores

13

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0630
Variant links:
Genes affected
CTSD (HGNC:2529): (cathepsin D) This gene encodes a member of the A1 family of peptidases. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple protein products. These products include the cathepsin D light and heavy chains, which heterodimerize to form the mature enzyme. This enzyme exhibits pepsin-like activity and plays a role in protein turnover and in the proteolytic activation of hormones and growth factors. Mutations in this gene play a causal role in neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis-10 and may be involved in the pathogenesis of several other diseases, including breast cancer and possibly Alzheimer's disease. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]
PRADX (HGNC:40168): (PRC2 and DDX5 associated lncRNA)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.039098263).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CTSDNM_001909.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.190G>C p.Glu64Gln missense_variant 2/9 ENST00000236671.7
PRADXNR_182291.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.876C>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CTSDENST00000236671.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.190G>C p.Glu64Gln missense_variant 2/91 NM_001909.5 P2
PRADXENST00000449248.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.876C>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/21

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000137
AC:
2
AN:
1461566
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00000138
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
727092
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
8.99e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeAug 27, 2021This sequence change replaces glutamic acid with glutamine at codon 64 of the CTSD protein (p.Glu64Gln). The glutamic acid residue is weakly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between glutamic acid and glutamine. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CTSD-related conditions. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The glutamine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.081
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.24
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
Cadd
Benign
3.3
Dann
Benign
0.47
Eigen
Benign
-1.7
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.7
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.13
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.41
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.058
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.039
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
Polyphen
0.0
.;.;B;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.15
MutPred
0.22
Loss of sheet (P = 0.1907);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1907);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1907);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1907);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1907);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1907);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1907);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1907);.;.;.;
MVP
0.23
MPC
0.50
ClinPred
0.066
T
GERP RS
-3.6
Varity_R
0.16
gMVP
0.39

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs539823013; hg19: chr11-1782577; API