rs541217363
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PVS1PM2PP5
The NM_000459.5(TEK):c.921C>A(p.Tyr307*) variant causes a stop gained change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Variant results in nonsense mediated mRNA decay.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000459.5 stop_gained
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- multiple cutaneous and mucosal venous malformationsInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia
- primary congenital glaucomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- TEK-related primary glaucomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- glaucoma 3, primary congenital, EInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- congenital glaucomaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000459.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEK | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.921C>A | p.Tyr307* | stop_gained | Exon 7 of 23 | ENSP00000369375.4 | Q02763-1 | ||
| TEK | TSL:1 | c.461-3200C>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000428337.1 | E5RIV9 | |||
| TEK | c.963C>A | p.Tyr321* | stop_gained | Exon 7 of 23 | ENSP00000593326.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at