rs543698823
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 16 ACMG points: 16P and 0B. PVS1PP5_Very_Strong
The NM_006017.3(PROM1):c.1354dupT(p.Tyr452fs) variant causes a frameshift change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000331 in 1,612,370 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. YY452F?) has been classified as Pathogenic. Variant results in nonsense mediated mRNA decay.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
PROM1
NM_006017.3 frameshift
NM_006017.3 frameshift
Scores
Not classified
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.60
Genes affected
PROM1 (HGNC:9454): (prominin 1) This gene encodes a pentaspan transmembrane glycoprotein. The protein localizes to membrane protrusions and is often expressed on adult stem cells, where it is thought to function in maintaining stem cell properties by suppressing differentiation. Mutations in this gene have been shown to result in retinitis pigmentosa and Stargardt disease. Expression of this gene is also associated with several types of cancer. This gene is expressed from at least five alternative promoters that are expressed in a tissue-dependent manner. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 16 ACMG points.
PVS1
Loss of function variant, product undergoes nonsense mediated mRNA decay. LoF is a known mechanism of disease.
PP5
Variant 4-16006637-T-TA is Pathogenic according to our data. Variant chr4-16006637-T-TA is described in ClinVar as [Likely_pathogenic]. Clinvar id is 372711.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000217 AC: 33AN: 151932Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
33
AN:
151932
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000220 AC: 54AN: 245996Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000225 AC XY: 30AN XY: 133438
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
54
AN:
245996
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
133438
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000343 AC: 501AN: 1460438Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000381 AC XY: 277AN XY: 726338
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
501
AN:
1460438
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
277
AN XY:
726338
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000217 AC: 33AN: 151932Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000229 AC XY: 17AN XY: 74180
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
33
AN:
151932
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
74180
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Cone-rod dystrophy 12 Pathogenic:5
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard | May 02, 2023 | The homozygous p.Tyr452LeufsTer13 variant in PROM1 was identified by our study in one individual with cone-rod dystrophy. The p.Tyr452LeufsTer13 variant in PROM1 has been previously reported in 7 unrelated individuals with PROM1-associated retinopathy (PMID: 28041643, PMID: 19718270, PMID: 24154662, PMID: 26103963, PMID: 27874104, PMID: 25999674) and segregated with disease in 3 affected relatives from one family (PMID: 19718270) but has been identified in 0.05% (8/15262) of Latino/Admixed American chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP ID: rs543698823). Although this variant has been seen in the general population in a heterozygous state, its frequency is not high enough to rule out a pathogenic role. Of these 7 previously reported unrelated individuals with PROM1-associated retinopathy (PMID: 28041643, PMID: 19718270, PMID: 24154662, PMID: 26103963, PMID: 27874104, PMID: 25999674), 3 were homozygotes (PMID: 19718270, PMID: 26103963, PMID: 27874104) and 3 were compound heterozygotes who carried pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants with unknown phase (PMID: 28041643, ClinVar Variation ID: 236527; PMID: 24154662, ClinVar Variation ID: 438215; PMID: 26103963, NC_000004.12:g.16006536A>G), which increases the likelihood that the p.Tyr452LeufsTer13 variant is pathogenic. This variant has also been reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 372711) and has been interpreted as pathogenic or likely pathogenic by multiple submitters. This variant is predicted to cause a frameshift, which alters the protein’s amino acid sequence beginning at position 452 and leads to a premature termination codon 13 amino acids downstream. This alteration is then predicted to lead to a truncated or absent protein. Loss of function of the PROM1 gene is an established disease mechanism in autosomal recessive PROM1-associated retinal disease. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as pathogenic for autosomal recessive neuronal PROM1-associated retinal disease. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PVS1, PM3_Strong, PP1 (Richards 2015). - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, M Health Fairview: University of Minnesota | Dec 14, 2016 | - - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital Tübingen | Aug 20, 2024 | - - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Nov 25, 2022 | This variant was identified as homozygous._x000D_ Criteria applied: PVS1, PM3, PP4 - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genomics England Pilot Project, Genomics England | - | - - |
Retinal dystrophy Pathogenic:4
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, Univ. Regensburg, Univ. Regensburg | Jan 01, 2023 | - - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Blueprint Genetics | Sep 15, 2017 | - - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | research | NIHR Bioresource Rare Diseases, University of Cambridge | Jan 01, 2015 | - - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology | Jan 05, 2022 | - - |
Retinitis pigmentosa 41 Pathogenic:3
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester, Central Manchester University Hospitals | Feb 01, 2019 | - - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Ocular Genomics Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear | Apr 08, 2021 | The PROM1 c.1354dup variant was identified in an individual with retinitis pigmentosa with a presumed recessive inheritance pattern. Through a review of available evidence we were able to apply the following criteria: PVS1, PM2, PM3, PP1-M. Based on this evidence we have classified this variant as Pathogenic. - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
not provided Pathogenic:3
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 04, 2022 | Frameshift variant predicted to result in nonsense mediated decay in a gene for which loss-of-function is a known mechanism of disease; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19718270, 24154662, 27874104, 25472526) - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2024 | PROM1: PVS1, PM3:Strong, PM2, PP1:Moderate - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 19, 2024 | This sequence change creates a premature translational stop signal (p.Tyr452Leufs*13) in the PROM1 gene. It is expected to result in an absent or disrupted protein product. Loss-of-function variants in PROM1 are known to be pathogenic (PMID: 17605048, 19718270, 24154662, 25474345). This variant is present in population databases (rs543698823, gnomAD 0.04%). This premature translational stop signal has been observed in individual(s) with autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy, or retinal disease (PMID: 19718270, 24154662, 27874104, 28041643). It has also been observed to segregate with disease in related individuals. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 372711). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. - |
PROM1-related disorder Pathogenic:2
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 21, 2024 | The PROM1 c.1354dupT variant is predicted to result in a frameshift and premature protein termination (p.Tyr452Leufs*13). This variant has been reported many times in the homozygous and compound heterozygous states in individuals with retinal dystrophy (see for examples: referred to as c.1349insT in Pras et al. 2009. PubMed ID: 19718270; referred to as c.1354_1355insT in Wang et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 24154662). This variant is reported in 0.037% of alleles in individuals of Latino descent in gnomAD. Frameshift variants in PROM1 are an established mechanism of disease. Given the evidence, we interpret this variant as pathogenic for autosomal recessive disease. - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | The PROM1 c.1354dupT (p.Tyr452LeufsTer13) variant results in a frameshift and is predicted to result in premature termination of the protein. The p.Tyr452LeufsTer13 variant has been reported in at least five studies in a total of six individuals with PROM1-related disorders, including two homozygotes and one presumed compound heterozygote with cone or cone-rod dystrophy, and in one homozygote, one presumed compound heterozygote, and one heterozygote with retinitis pigmentosa (Pras et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2014; van Huet et al. 2015; Boulanger-Scemama et al. 2015; Habibi et al. 2016). The p.Tyr452LeufsTer13 variant was absent from 100 controls and is reported with a frequency of 0.00026 in the European (non-Finnish) population from the Exome Aggregation Consortium. While some variants in the PROM1 gene have been associated with both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive PROM1-related disorders, review of the available literature reveals that this variant appears to be contributing to an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance for cone/cone-rod dystrophy and retinitis pigmentosa. Based on the evidence and due to the potential impact of frameshift variants, the p.Tyr452LeufsTer13 is classified as likely pathogenic for PROM1-related disorders. This variant was observed by ICSL as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. - |
Autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Faculty of Health Sciences, Beirut Arab University | Nov 22, 2016 | - - |
Cone-rod dystrophy 2 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | research | Laboratory of Genetics in Ophthalmology, Institut Imagine | - | - - |
Stargardt disease Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | research | Ophthalmo-Genetics Lab, Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana | Dec 14, 2022 | - - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | research | Sharon lab, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center | Jun 23, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at