rs545330660

chr11-65870630-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM2 BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7

The NM_016938.5(EFEMP2):c.396C>T(p.His132=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000297 in 1,614,016 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000029 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: EFEMP2 NM_016938.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.970

Genes affected

EFEMP2 (HGNC:3219): (EGF containing fibulin extracellular matrix protein 2) A large number of extracellular matrix proteins have been found to contain variations of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain and have been implicated in functions as diverse as blood coagulation, activation of complement and determination of cell fate during development. The protein encoded by this gene contains four EGF2 domains and six calcium-binding EGF2 domains. This gene is necessary for elastic fiber formation and connective tissue development. Defects in this gene are cause of an autosomal recessive cutis laxa syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

• PM2: Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage
• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
• BP6: Variant 11-65870630-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-65870630-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 472823.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.97 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
EFEMP2	NM_016938.5	c.396C>T	p.His132=	synonymous_variant	5/11	ENST00000307998.11
EFEMP2	NR_037718.2	n.521C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	5/12

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
EFEMP2	ENST00000307998.11	c.396C>T	p.His132=	synonymous_variant	5/11	1	NM_016938.5	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6 AN: 152124 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000966

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 5 AN: 250636 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000737 AC XY: 1 AN XY: 135662

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000124

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.0000464

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000287 AC: 42 AN: 1461774 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000248 AC XY: 18 AN XY: 727194

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0000447

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.000162

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000198

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6 AN: 152242 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3 AN XY: 74424

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000963

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Bravo AF: 0.0000340

EpiCase AF: 0.000109

EpiControl AF: 0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

Cutis laxa, autosomal recessive, type 1B Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Invitae

Oct 07, 2023

- -

not specified Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Sep 21, 2017

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Sep 16, 2019

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.63
Cadd	Benign	3.5
Dann	Benign	0.91
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.7

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.030		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs545330660; hg19: chr11-65638101;