rs546669133
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4BP6BS2
The ENST00000324631.13(CACNB2):c.1936C>T(p.Arg646Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000856 in 1,611,838 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R646Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000324631.13 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNB2 | NM_201596.3 | c.1936C>T | p.Arg646Trp | missense_variant | 14/14 | ENST00000324631.13 | NP_963890.2 | |
CACNB2 | NM_201590.3 | c.1774C>T | p.Arg592Trp | missense_variant | 13/13 | ENST00000377329.10 | NP_963884.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNB2 | ENST00000324631.13 | c.1936C>T | p.Arg646Trp | missense_variant | 14/14 | 1 | NM_201596.3 | ENSP00000320025 | ||
CACNB2 | ENST00000377329.10 | c.1774C>T | p.Arg592Trp | missense_variant | 13/13 | 1 | NM_201590.3 | ENSP00000366546 | ||
ENST00000425669.1 | n.377-378G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000232 AC: 35AN: 150738Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000112 AC: 28AN: 249988Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000118 AC XY: 16AN XY: 135446
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000705 AC: 103AN: 1461038Hom.: 1 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0000688 AC XY: 50AN XY: 726854
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000232 AC: 35AN: 150800Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000204 AC XY: 15AN XY: 73496
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Brugada syndrome 4 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Sep 01, 2022 | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with tryptophan, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 592 of the CACNB2 protein (p.Arg592Trp). This variant is present in population databases (rs546669133, gnomAD 0.06%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CACNB2-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 299567). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Probably Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 21, 2021 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 29, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at