rs548726318
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. PP2BP4_Strong
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):āc.12484T>Cā(p.Ser4162Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000868 in 1,613,684 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.12484T>C | p.Ser4162Pro | missense_variant | 48/363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.12484T>C | p.Ser4162Pro | missense_variant | 48/363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141 | P1 | |
TTN-AS1 | ENST00000659121.1 | n.1134-2132A>G | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152040Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000282 AC: 7AN: 248124Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.0000297 AC XY: 4AN XY: 134560
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000753 AC: 11AN: 1461526Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000963 AC XY: 7AN XY: 727044
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152158Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74382
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 17, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at