rs549164618

Positions:

chr5-13901474-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The ENST00000265104.5(DNAH5):c.1830G>A(p.Gln610=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000292 in 1,613,908 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00030 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
ENST00000265104.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.65

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

DNAH5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.35).

BP6

Variant 5-13901474-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13901474-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 238966.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.65 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000304 (444/1461620) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0045 (388/86242). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00413. There are 10 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 313 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 10 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAH5	NM_001369.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.1830G>A	p.Gln610=	synonymous_variant	14/79	ENST00000265104.5	NP_001360.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DNAH5	ENST00000265104.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.1830G>A	p.Gln610=	synonymous_variant	14/79	1	NM_001369.3	ENSP00000265104	P4
DNAH5	ENST00000681290.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.1785G>A	p.Gln595=	synonymous_variant	14/79			ENSP00000505288	A1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000184

AC:

AN:

152170

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000169

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00435

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000791

AC:

196

AN:

247810

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000968

AC XY:

130

AN XY:

134246

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000125

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000290

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00606

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000541

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000330

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000304

AC:

444

AN:

1461620

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000430

AC XY:

313

AN XY:

727082

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00450

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000243

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000447

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000184

AC:

AN:

152288

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000215

AC XY:

AN XY:

74456

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000168

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00435

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000579

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000831

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00260

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Jan 12, 2016	This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 28, 2024	- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.35

CADD

Benign

8.1

DANN

Benign

0.70

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over