Menu
GeneBe

rs549559726

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong

The NM_005732.4(RAD50):c.2209C>G(p.Gln737Glu) variant causes a missense, splice region change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000715 in 1,609,376 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 2/2 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: đť‘“ 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes đť‘“: 0.000075 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

RAD50
NM_005732.4 missense, splice_region

Scores

1
2
9
Splicing: ADA: 0.0009128
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.78
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.025467187).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RAD50NM_005732.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2209C>G p.Gln737Glu missense_variant, splice_region_variant 14/25 ENST00000378823.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RAD50ENST00000378823.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.2209C>G p.Gln737Glu missense_variant, splice_region_variant 14/251 NM_005732.4 P1Q92878-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000395
AC:
6
AN:
152024
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
13
AN:
247246
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000598
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
133688
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000715
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000748
AC:
109
AN:
1457234
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000690
AC XY:
50
AN XY:
725010
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00273
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
9.02e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152142
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000538
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74384
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756
ExAC
AF:
0.0000824
AC:
10
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 15, 2023The p.Q737E variant (also known as c.2209C>G), located in coding exon 14 of the RAD50 gene, results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 2209. The glutamine at codon 737 is replaced by glutamic acid, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration was detected in a Korean ovarian cancer patient (Choi MC et al. Cancer Res Treat, 2020 Apr;52:634-644). This alteration was also identified in a cohort of patients diagnosed with biliary tract carcinoma undergoing multigene panel testing for hereditary cancer risk (Terashima T et al. Oncotarget, 2019 Oct;10:5949-5957). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeNov 11, 2023This sequence change replaces glutamine, which is neutral and polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 737 of the RAD50 protein (p.Gln737Glu). This variant is present in population databases (rs549559726, gnomAD 0.07%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with biliary tract cancer and/or pancreatic cancer (PMID: 31666926, 36135357). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 187622). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchCancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer ResearchMay 01, 2019- -
Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 23, 2019Variant summary: RAD50 c.2209C>G (p.Gln737Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant is located close to a canonical splice site therefore could affect splicing: 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 5.3e-05 in 247246 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00071 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequencies within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 11-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RAD50 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer phenotype (6.3e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. In addition, in certain East Asian subpopulations the variant was reported with even higher frequencies, e.g. in the Koreans (0.0032; in gnomAD) and in the Japanese (0.0040; in the jMorp database), further supporting a benign role of the variant. The variant c.2209C>G has been reported in the literature in two Japanese individuals affected with biliary tract carcinoma (Terashima_2019), however without strong evidence for causality. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and all of them classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.099
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.44
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
Cadd
Benign
17
Dann
Uncertain
0.98
Eigen
Benign
-0.31
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.11
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.0053
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.025
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.55
T
Polyphen
0.0
.;.;.;B
Vest4
0.36
MutPred
0.44
.;.;.;Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0738);
MVP
0.48
ClinPred
0.091
T
GERP RS
4.3
Varity_R
0.22
gMVP
0.22

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00091
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.072
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs549559726; hg19: chr5-131938993; COSMIC: COSV54757231; API