rs551923672

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_015443.4(KANSL1):c.1673A>T(p.Asp558Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000787 in 1,614,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D558H) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000084 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

KANSL1
NM_015443.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.92

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

KANSL1 (HGNC:24565): (KAT8 regulatory NSL complex subunit 1) This gene encodes a nuclear protein that is a subunit of two protein complexes involved with histone acetylation, the MLL1 complex and the NSL1 complex. The encoded protein has been implicated in a variety of cellular processes including enhancer regulation, cell proliferation, and mitosis. Mutations in this gene are associated with Koolen-de Vries Syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

KANSL1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Koolen-de Vries syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
Koolen-de Vries syndrome due to a point mutation
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

KANSL1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.026368946).

BP6

Variant 17-46066712-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-46066712-T-A is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 468397.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000263 (4/152366) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.000621 (3/4832). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000169. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 2 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 123 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
KANSL1	NM_015443.4 link	c.1673A>T	p.Asp558Val	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 15	ENST00000432791.7	NP_056258.1	Q7Z3B3-1A0A024R9Y2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
KANSL1	ENST00000432791.7 link	c.1673A>T	p.Asp558Val	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 15	1	NM_015443.4	ENSP00000387393.3		Q7Z3B3-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152248

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000620

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000180

AC:

AN:

250550

AF XY:

0.000273

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000884

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000842

AC:

123

AN:

1461660

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000117

AC XY:

AN XY:

727112

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44698

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26126

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39674

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00128

AC:

110

AN:

86230

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53378

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000630

AC:

AN:

1111918

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000828

AC:

AN:

60388

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152366

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000268

AC XY:

AN XY:

74516

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41592

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15308

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5192

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000621

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.463

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000189

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000181

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:1

Apr 18, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Koolen-de Vries syndrome

Benign:1

Oct 25, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.28

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.32

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.27

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.98

Eigen

Benign

-0.19

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.041

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.91

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.92

.;.;.;.;D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.020

MetaRNN

Benign

0.026

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

PhyloP100

3.9

PrimateAI

Benign

0.45

PROVEAN

Benign

-2.1

N;.;.;.;.;N;.;.;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.24

Sift

Benign

0.12

T;.;.;.;.;T;.;.;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.23

T;T;T;.;T;T;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.50

MutPred

0.37

Loss of disorder (P = 0.0387);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0387);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0387);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0387);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0387);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0387);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0387);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0387);.;Loss of disorder (P = 0.0387);

MVP

0.36

MPC

0.74

ClinPred

0.048

GERP RS

3.8

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.97

RBP_regulation_power_radar

2.7

gMVP

0.47

Mutation Taster

=89/11

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over