rs553317698
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001081637.3(LILRB1):c.866G>A(p.Arg289His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000248 in 1,613,670 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R289P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001081637.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LILRB1 | NM_001081637.3 | c.866G>A | p.Arg289His | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 15 | ENST00000324602.12 | NP_001075106.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LILRB1 | ENST00000324602.12 | c.866G>A | p.Arg289His | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 15 | 5 | NM_001081637.3 | ENSP00000315997.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 5AN: 251356 AF XY: 0.0000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000240 AC: 35AN: 1461364Hom.: 0 Cov.: 74 AF XY: 0.0000261 AC XY: 19AN XY: 726996 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000328 AC: 5AN: 152306Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74460 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at