Menu
GeneBe

rs553907248

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 2P and 16B. PP3_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.1568A>G(p.Tyr523Cys) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000026 in 1,614,228 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Y523H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00016 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense, splice_region

Scores

13
5
1

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:6B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.11
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.89
BP6
Variant 16-68819282-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68819282-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 141014.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000164 (25/152346) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.0015 (23/15302). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00103. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 12 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 25 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1568A>G p.Tyr523Cys missense_variant, splice_region_variant 11/16 ENST00000261769.10
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1385A>G p.Tyr462Cys missense_variant, splice_region_variant 10/15
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.20A>G p.Tyr7Cys missense_variant, splice_region_variant 11/16
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-254-2719A>G intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1568A>G p.Tyr523Cys missense_variant, splice_region_variant 11/161 NM_004360.5 P1P12830-1
ENST00000563916.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.264-3623T>C intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000164
AC:
25
AN:
152228
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000318
AC:
8
AN:
251482
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000368
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
135916
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000867
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000879
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000652
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
17
AN:
1461882
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00000963
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000179
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000116
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000164
AC:
25
AN:
152346
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000161
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
74508
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000240
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.0000675
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000351
ExAC
AF:
0.0000247
AC:
3

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:7
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJan 27, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 06, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 30, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingSt. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research HospitalJun 21, 2023The CDH1 c.1568A>G (p.Tyr523Cys) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.011% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). This variant is located adjacent to the acceptor splice site of intron 10, however it is not predicted to affect splicing. Canonical splice site variants affecting this acceptor site are predicted to result in an in-frame insertion with a potential rescue transcript (PMID: 36600593). This variant has been identified in BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer patients, however it is unknown if these individuals had lobular breast cancer (PMID: 29522266, 31780696). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Oct 10, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 24, 2020This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJan 23, 2023This missense variant replaces tyrosine with cysteine at codon 523 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast cancer in the literature (PMID: 29522266, 31780696). This variant has been identified in 9/282890 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoNov 21, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 04, 2023Variant summary: CDH1 c.1568A>G (p.Tyr523Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Cadherin-like domian (IPR002126) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00017 in 151000 control chromosomes (gnomAD v3.1.2), predominantly at a frequency of 0.0015 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 53 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Latino origin. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Eight ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: five classified the variant as uncertain significance, two as likely benign, and one as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 11, 2020Observed in individuals with breast cancer (Hauke 2018, Dutil 2019); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27181684, 29522266, 31780696, 32936981) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoFeb 06, 2023- -
CDH1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJan 08, 2024This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert PanelAug 03, 2023The filtering allele frequency of the c.1568A>G (p.Tyr523Cys) variant in the CDH1 gene is 0.15% for Latino/Admixed American chromosomes in gnomAD (95% CI of 23/15282), which meets the allele frequency threshold defined by the ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel for considering strong evidence against pathogenicity for autosomal dominant hereditary diffuse gastric cancer variants (BS1). This variant has been observed in >10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). This variant was observed in the homozygous state in 9 individuals without personal and/or family history of DGC, LBC, or SRC tumors (BP2_strong; internal laboratory contributors). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: BS1, BS2, BP2_strong. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 06/26/2023) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.88
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.25
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.32
Cadd
Pathogenic
28
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.62
D;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.95
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.82
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
1.0
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.97
D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.59
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.89
D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.64
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
4.2
H;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.61
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-8.4
D;.;.;.;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.77
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.98
MutPred
0.72
Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.084);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.084);.;Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.084);.;
MVP
0.93
MPC
1.0
ClinPred
1.0
D
GERP RS
5.5
Varity_R
0.80
gMVP
0.89

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.10
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs553907248; hg19: chr16-68853185; COSMIC: COSV55738390; COSMIC: COSV55738390; API