rs554887705

Positions:

chr16-50711083-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1

The NM_001370466.1(NOD2):c.1091G>A(p.Arg364His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000139 in 1,614,154 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R364C) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NOD2
NM_001370466.1 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.663

Variant links:

Genes affected

NOD2 (HGNC:5331): (nucleotide binding oligomerization domain containing 2) This gene is a member of the Nod1/Apaf-1 family and encodes a protein with two caspase recruitment (CARD) domains and six leucine-rich repeats (LRRs). The protein is primarily expressed in the peripheral blood leukocytes. It plays a role in the immune response to intracellular bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) by recognizing the muramyl dipeptide (MDP) derived from them and activating the NFKB protein. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Crohn disease and Blau syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

NOD2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0072007775).

BP6

Variant 16-50711083-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-50711083-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 319442.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000105 (16/152276) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0029 (14/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00175. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 12 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
NOD2	NM_001370466.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.1091G>A	p.Arg364His	missense_variant	4/12	ENST00000647318.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
NOD2	ENST00000647318.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.1091G>A	p.Arg364His	missense_variant	4/12		NM_001370466.1	P1	Q9HC29-2
NOD2	ENST00000300589.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.1172G>A	p.Arg391His	missense_variant	4/12	1			Q9HC29-1
NOD2	ENST00000641284.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.1091G>A	p.Arg364His	missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant	4/6
NOD2	ENST00000646677.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.1091G>A	p.Arg364His	missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant	4/13

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152158

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00311

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000231

AC:

AN:

251440

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000346

AC XY:

AN XY:

135904

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00170

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000143

AC:

209

AN:

1461878

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000208

AC XY:

151

AN XY:

727240

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000894

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00206

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000189

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000828

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000105

AC:

AN:

152276

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000161

AC XY:

AN XY:

74472

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00290

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000499

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000227

ExAC

AF:

0.000321

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Regional enteritis;C5201146:Blau syndrome

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Invitae

Oct 19, 2022

- -

Autoinflammatory syndrome

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Feb 01, 2019

- -

Inflammatory bowel disease 1

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Blau syndrome

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.071

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.55

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.59

CADD

Benign

4.2

DANN

Benign

0.84

Eigen

Benign

-1.4

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.4

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.043

LIST_S2

Benign

0.71

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.056

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0072

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.95

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

PrimateAI

Benign

0.18

Polyphen

0.012

B;B

Vest4

0.12

MutPred

0.48

.;Loss of phosphorylation at S396 (P = 0.1583);

MVP

0.59

MPC

0.12

ClinPred

0.0092

GERP RS

-1.4

Varity_R

0.017

gMVP

0.21

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over