rs555329045

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_006302.3(MOGS):c.12C>G(p.Gly4Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00139 in 1,442,906 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00089 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

MOGS
NM_006302.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0530

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

MOGS (HGNC:24862): (mannosyl-oligosaccharide glucosidase) This gene encodes the first enzyme in the N-linked oligosaccharide processing pathway. The enzyme cleaves the distal alpha-1,2-linked glucose residue from the Glc(3)-Man(9)-GlcNAc(2) oligosaccharide precursor. This protein is located in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. Defects in this gene are a cause of type IIb congenital disorder of glycosylation (CDGIIb). Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

MOGS Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

MOGS-congenital disorder of glycosylation
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

MOGS links:

ENSG00000286883 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000286883 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).

BP6

Variant 2-74465236-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-74465236-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 384985.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.053 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000886 (135/152308) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00172 (117/68016). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00147. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 60 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MOGS	NM_006302.3 link	c.12C>G	p.Gly4Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 4	ENST00000448666.7	NP_006293.2
MOGS	NM_001146158.2 link	c.-59+78C>G		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 4		NP_001139630.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MOGS	ENST00000448666.7 link	c.12C>G	p.Gly4Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 4	1	NM_006302.3	ENSP00000410992.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000880

AC:

134

AN:

152196

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000941

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00172

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000851

AC:

AN:

75236

AF XY:

0.000896

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000708

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00129

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00195

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00145

AC:

1868

AN:

1290598

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00139

AC XY:

882

AN XY:

636178

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000773

AC:

AN:

25872

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000821

AC:

AN:

18270

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000111

AC:

AN:

17940

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

32434

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000164

AC:

AN:

61078

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000469

AC:

AN:

31966

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000258

AC:

AN:

3870

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00172

AC:

1795

AN:

1045924

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000695

AC:

AN:

53244

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.456

Heterozygous variant carriers

186

279

372

465

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

152

228

304

380

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000886

AC:

135

AN:

152308

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000806

AC XY:

AN XY:

74476

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

41578

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000261

AC:

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5172

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000941

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

292

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00172

AC:

117

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.484

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00132

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000816

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Apr 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

MOGS: BP4, BP7 -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

MOGS-congenital disorder of glycosylation

Benign:2

Mar 04, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Feb 16, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.37

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.83

PhyloP100

0.053

PromoterAI

0.040

Neutral

(source)

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over