rs555404
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001302554.2(ACADS):c.605T>C(p.Leu202Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.471 in 1,590,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 180,631 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/16 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001302554.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- short chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001302554.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACADS | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.625-99T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000242592.4 | P16219 | |||
| ACADS | TSL:2 | c.605T>C | p.Leu202Pro | missense | Exon 5 of 10 | ENSP00000401045.2 | E9PE82 | ||
| ACADS | c.625-99T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000616618.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.521 AC: 79102AN: 151788Hom.: 21249 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.520 AC: 109704AN: 210954 AF XY: 0.520 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.466 AC: 670092AN: 1439032Hom.: 159352 Cov.: 84 AF XY: 0.471 AC XY: 336306AN XY: 714224 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.521 AC: 79174AN: 151906Hom.: 21279 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.529 AC XY: 39258AN XY: 74226 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at