rs555407951
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_004260.4(RECQL4):c.1561C>T(p.Arg521Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000133 in 1,611,452 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 10/13 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004260.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RECQL4 | NM_004260.4 | c.1561C>T | p.Arg521Trp | missense_variant | 9/21 | ENST00000617875.6 | NP_004251.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RECQL4 | ENST00000617875.6 | c.1561C>T | p.Arg521Trp | missense_variant | 9/21 | 1 | NM_004260.4 | ENSP00000482313 | P1 | |
RECQL4 | ENST00000621189.4 | c.490C>T | p.Arg164Trp | missense_variant | 8/20 | 1 | ENSP00000483145 | |||
RECQL4 | ENST00000532846.2 | c.418C>T | p.Arg140Trp | missense_variant | 5/9 | 5 | ENSP00000476551 | |||
RECQL4 | ENST00000688394.1 | n.584C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000263 AC: 64AN: 243696Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000376 AC XY: 50AN XY: 133134
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000135 AC: 197AN: 1459190Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000197 AC XY: 143AN XY: 725764
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000112 AC: 17AN: 152262Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000175 AC XY: 13AN XY: 74440
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 04, 2020 | In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Baller-Gerold syndrome;C1849453:Rapadilino syndrome;C5203410:Rothmund-Thomson syndrome type 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Nov 10, 2021 | - - |
Baller-Gerold syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with tryptophan, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 521 of the RECQL4 protein (p.Arg521Trp). This variant is present in population databases (rs555407951, gnomAD 0.2%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RECQL4-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 239700). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt RECQL4 protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 16, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at