rs556110297

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.1171G>A(p.Val391Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000039 in 1,614,146 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000042 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:13B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.977

Variant links:

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

CDH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.042580932).

BP6

Variant 16-68813346-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68813346-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 184651.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=13}.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 61 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5 link	c.1171G>A	p.Val391Ile	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 16	ENST00000261769.10	NP_004351.1	P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317185.2 link	c.-445G>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 9 of 16		NP_001304114.1	P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1	NM_001317186.2 link	c.-649G>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 9 of 15		NP_001304115.1	P12830B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317184.2 link	c.1137+1083G>A		intron_variant	Intron 8 of 14		NP_001304113.1	P12830-2B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10 link	c.1171G>A	p.Val391Ile	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 16	1	NM_004360.5	ENSP00000261769.4		P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152146

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000477

AC:

AN:

251472

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000294

AC XY:

AN XY:

135908

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000980

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000924

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000417

AC:

AN:

1461882

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000330

AC XY:

AN XY:

727242

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000447

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000128

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000562

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000378

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000331

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152264

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74436

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000658

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000113

ExAC

AF:

0.0000906

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:13Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma

Uncertain:5

Oct 27, 2016

Counsyl

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 391 of the CDH1 protein (p.Val391Ile). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 25186627, 36436516). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 184651). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant¬†is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Jul 10, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The CDH1 gene sequence change replaces valine with isoleucine at codon 391 of the CDH1 protein (p.Val391Ile). The valine residue is weakly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between valine and isoleucine. This variant is present in population databases (rs556110297, ExAC 0.02%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant (PMID: 28166811). This variant has been observed in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 25186627). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 184651). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align- GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Heterozygous pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in the CDH1 gene cause increased susceptibility to breast cancer (OMIM# 114480). -

Aug 01, 2022

European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BS2_Supporting (PMID: 30311375) -

Mar 06, 2023

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -

not provided

Uncertain:3

Jul 28, 2023

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Identified in individuals with a personal history of breast or other cancers, but also present in unaffected controls (Tung et al., 2015; Dorling et al., 2021; Yin et al., 2022); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25186627, 30287823, 33471991, 15235021, 22850631, 29641532, 36436516, 35171259) -

Jan 23, 2024

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The CDH1 c.1171G>A (p.Val391Ile) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 25186627 (2015), 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/CDH1), 36436516 (2023)) and pancreatic cancer (PMID: 35171259 (2022)). This variant has been identified in reportedly healthy individuals (PMID: 29641532 (2018), 33471991 (2021), 36243179 (2022), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/CDH1)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000098 (3/30616 chromosomes in South Asian subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Apr 11, 2018

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The CDH1 c.1171G>A; p.Val391Ile variant (rs556110297), to our knowledge, is not reported in the medical literature. This variant is reported as uncertain by multiple laboratories in ClinVar (Variation ID: 184651), and found in the general population with an allele frequency of 0.005% (13/246240 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The valine at codon 391 is weakly conserved and computational algorithms (SIFT, PolyPhen2) predict this variant is tolerated. However, given the limited information regarding this variant, its clinical significance is uncertain at this time. -

Familial cancer of breast

Uncertain:3

May 20, 2023

Neuberg Centre For Genomic Medicine, NCGM

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The observed missense variant c.1171G>A(p.Val391Ile) in CDH1 gene has been reported previously in heterozygous state in an individual with breast cancer (Tung N, et al., 2015). The c.1171G>A variant is reported with 0.004% allele frequency in gnomAD Exomes. This variant has been submitted to the ClinVar database as Likely Benign/Uncertain Significnace (multiple submissions). The amino acid Valine at position 391 is changed to a Isoleucine changing protein sequence and it might alter its composition and physico-chemical properties. Multiple lines of computational evidence (Polyphen-Benign, SIFT-Tolerated and Mutation Taster-Polymorphism) predict no damaging effect on protein structure and function for this variant. The reference amino acid p.Val391Ile in CDH1 is predicted as conserved by GERP++ and PhyloP across 100 vertebrates. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Uncertain Significance. -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Dec 02, 2019

Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Feb 12, 2022

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Aug 16, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jun 27, 2023

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C0476089:Endometrial carcinoma;C0919267:Ovarian neoplasm;C1708349:Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma;C4551988:Blepharocheilodontic syndrome 1

Uncertain:1

Oct 31, 2018

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.078

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.42

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.60

CADD

Benign

5.6

DANN

Benign

0.87

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.22

T;T;T;.

Eigen

Benign

-1.1

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.1

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.27

LIST_S2

Benign

0.70

T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.014

MetaRNN

Benign

0.043

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.98

MutationAssessor

Benign

2.0

M;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.31

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.54

N;.;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.085

Sift

Benign

0.20

T;.;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.32

T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0010

B;.;.;.

Vest4

0.17

MutPred

0.45

Gain of catalytic residue at L396 (P = 0.0316);Gain of catalytic residue at L396 (P = 0.0316);Gain of catalytic residue at L396 (P = 0.0316);Gain of catalytic residue at L396 (P = 0.0316);

MVP

0.42

MPC

0.20

ClinPred

0.026

GERP RS

3.0

Varity_R

0.051

gMVP

0.25

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over