rs55679475

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000186.4(CFH):ā€‹c.3172T>Cā€‹(p.Tyr1058His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00038 in 1,613,990 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00043 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00037 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

CFH
NM_000186.4 missense

Scores

17

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.28
Variant links:
Genes affected
CFH (HGNC:4883): (complement factor H) This gene is a member of the Regulator of Complement Activation (RCA) gene cluster and encodes a protein with twenty short consensus repeat (SCR) domains. This protein is secreted into the bloodstream and has an essential role in the regulation of complement activation, restricting this innate defense mechanism to microbial infections. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) and chronic hypocomplementemic nephropathy. Alternate transcriptional splice variants, encoding different isoforms, have been characterized. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005656332).
BP6
Variant 1-196743490-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-196743490-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 294521.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-196743490-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000433 (66/152348) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.01 (52/5192). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00785. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 36 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CFHNM_000186.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3172T>C p.Tyr1058His missense_variant 20/22 ENST00000367429.9 NP_000177.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CFHENST00000367429.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.3172T>C p.Tyr1058His missense_variant 20/221 NM_000186.4 ENSP00000356399 P2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000434
AC:
66
AN:
152230
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00999
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000664
AC:
167
AN:
251326
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000729
AC XY:
99
AN XY:
135830
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000867
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00820
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000374
AC:
547
AN:
1461642
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000389
AC XY:
283
AN XY:
727114
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000201
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000359
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000297
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000298
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000433
AC:
66
AN:
152348
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000483
AC XY:
36
AN XY:
74500
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0100
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000945
Alfa
AF:
0.000131
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000533
ExAC
AF:
0.000782
AC:
95
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Hemolytic uremic syndrome, atypical, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabApr 11, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Age related macular degeneration 4 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabApr 11, 2023- -
Basal laminar drusen Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabApr 11, 2023- -
Factor H deficiency;C0730295:Basal laminar drusen;C1853147:Age related macular degeneration 4;C2749604:Hemolytic uremic syndrome, atypical, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsSep 03, 2021- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 02, 2023This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Factor H deficiency Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabApr 11, 2023- -
CFH-Related Dense Deposit Disease / Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis Type II Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.086
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.63
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.67
CADD
Benign
0.010
DANN
Benign
0.25
Eigen
Benign
-2.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.3
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.042
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.12
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.040
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0057
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.13
N
REVEL
Benign
0.091
Sift
Benign
0.55
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.55
T
Vest4
0.086
MutPred
0.55
Loss of stability (P = 0.0094);
MVP
0.37
MPC
0.18
ClinPred
0.0050
T
GERP RS
-10
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
gMVP
0.62

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55679475; hg19: chr1-196712620; COSMIC: COSV66406832; COSMIC: COSV66406832; API