rs55688805
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.6192G>A(p.Gly2064Gly) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00479 in 1,613,378 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0044 ( 4 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0048 ( 23 hom. )
Consequence
MYO15A
NM_016239.4 synonymous
NM_016239.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.75
Genes affected
MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).
BP6
Variant 17-18144511-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-18144511-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 178446.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=1, Benign=3}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00437 (665/152282) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00615 (418/68018). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00566. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 378 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00437 AC: 665AN: 152164Hom.: 4 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
665
AN:
152164
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00439 AC: 1093AN: 249194Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00427 AC XY: 577AN XY: 135252
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1093
AN:
249194
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
577
AN XY:
135252
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00483 AC: 7056AN: 1461096Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00470 AC XY: 3418AN XY: 726858
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
7056
AN:
1461096
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3418
AN XY:
726858
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00437 AC: 665AN: 152282Hom.: 4 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00508 AC XY: 378AN XY: 74448
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
665
AN:
152282
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
378
AN XY:
74448
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 11, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Dec 01, 2022 | MYO15A: BP4, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 30, 2012 | Gly2064Gly in Exon 29 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located with in the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.5% (31/6884) of E uropean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenci ng Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs55688805). - |
MYO15A-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 22, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at