Menu
GeneBe

rs557160401

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_000126.4(ETFA):c.20C>T(p.Pro7Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000411 in 1,562,322 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P7P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00043 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ETFA
NM_000126.4 missense

Scores

3
14

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.842
Variant links:
Genes affected
ETFA (HGNC:3481): (electron transfer flavoprotein subunit alpha) ETFA participates in catalyzing the initial step of the mitochondrial fatty acid beta-oxidation. It shuttles electrons between primary flavoprotein dehydrogenases and the membrane-bound electron transfer flavoprotein ubiquinone oxidoreductase. Defects in electron-transfer-flavoprotein have been implicated in type II glutaricaciduria in which multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiencies result in large excretion of glutaric, lactic, ethylmalonic, butyric, isobutyric, 2-methyl-butyric, and isovaleric acids. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005465746).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000263 (40/152360) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000544 (37/68038). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000405. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 18 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ETFANM_000126.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.20C>T p.Pro7Leu missense_variant 1/12 ENST00000557943.6
ETFANM_001127716.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.20C>T p.Pro7Leu missense_variant 1/11
ETFAXR_007064434.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.101C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/12

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ETFAENST00000557943.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.20C>T p.Pro7Leu missense_variant 1/121 NM_000126.4 P1P13804-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000263
AC:
40
AN:
152242
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000723
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000544
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000187
AC:
30
AN:
160244
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000207
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
87052
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000134
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000421
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000448
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000427
AC:
602
AN:
1409962
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000431
AC XY:
300
AN XY:
696648
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000124
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000534
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000837
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000529
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000291
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000263
AC:
40
AN:
152360
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000242
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74508
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000721
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000544
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000286
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000264
ExAC
AF:
0.000106
AC:
12

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeSep 24, 2022This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 7 of the ETFA protein (p.Pro7Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs557160401, gnomAD 0.04%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with ETFA-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 203689). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2022ETFA: PM2 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.19
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.17
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.15
Cadd
Benign
19
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.092
T;.;.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.89
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.88
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.25
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.78
T;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0055
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.55
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.69
N;N;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.67
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.65
N;N;N;N;N
Sift
Uncertain
0.0070
D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.11
T;T;D;T;.
Polyphen
0.0
B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.29
MVP
0.79
MPC
0.37
ClinPred
0.17
T
GERP RS
2.5
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.2
Varity_R
0.082
gMVP
0.32

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs557160401; hg19: chr15-76603710; API